Mitsubishi Tech Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 30 May 2012

Kesselring Site hits significant milestone

Posted on 19:21 by Unknown
The Navy's Kesselring Site NNPTU has hit a significant milestone; it has graduated its 50,000th student. A number of reports are out on this in national and local levels.

Wall Street Journal article online.

Coverage at The Saratogian.

Hudson Valley / Your News Now report with video and interview of 50,000th sailor.

The Kesselring Site is one of two prototype sites at which Navy personnel receive hands-on training in nuclear power. The other is located in Charleston, South Carolina. There used to be two more, which are closed down; the NRTS Navy facility in Idaho, and another site in Windsor, Connecticut.

The Kesselring Site was constructed in the mid-1950's to allow the full scale testing of the SIR (Submarine Intermediate Reactor) prototype plant which was being designed by the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory for the Navy. General Electric operated the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory for the AEC for the purpose of designing Naval power plants; the SIR project stemmed from a redirection of what had originally been a plan for a civilian liquid metal cooled breeder reactor, whose progress and funding became uncertain. According to testimony by Admiral Rickover (given some years later in 1957), the project was changed over to being a Navy project exclusively in order to ensure that funding continued. The SIR, later known as S1G reactor first achieved criticality on March 20, 1955; the plant generated its first useful power on May 18, 1955. In order to obtain the maximum press benefit from the startup of the plant, GE and the AEC staged a press event and on July 18, 1955 actually used the plant's generating equipment to sell power back to the commercial provider, thus claiming the first commercial sale of power generated by a nuclear plant at that time. (I have made a list of "nuclear firsts" from the 50's and it's incredible how every turn brings another claim of "first.")

In the reports above a massive spherical containment can be seen. This is the containment built for the S1G originally and is the largest spherical nuclear power plant containment vessel ever constructed anywhere. This sphere is 225 feet in diameter, and is thus larger than those built for Dresden 1, Garigliano (Italy), Yankee Rowe or any other. Below we see, from APR's collection, a January 1954 United Press photo, with original caption below, showing the sphere under construction with some detail airbrushed in.


----"ATOM ROUND-HOUSE" ... Schenectady, N.Y.: This giant steel sphere, which has a diameter of 225 feet, has been built by the Atomic Energy Commission to house its new atomic submarine reactor. The unique job of anchoring the 3,850 ton ball is now being completed by the Rust Engineering Company of Pittsburgh. Built over its foundation and supported by a ring of steel columns, the sphere posed the engineering problem of how to secure it in place without developing stresses that would break or distort its 1-inch skin. The engineering company solved it by alternately pouring a three-foot layer of limestone inside one day, and a three-foot layer of concrete outside the next, until the huge ball was secured. The figure shows trucks laying the limestone (A) and the concrete (B). The limestone is being poured to a height of some 38 feet to provide ballast and floor space. The shadowy structure inside the globe is an imaginary conception of the atomic reactor. It will be a prototype of the reactor planned for use in the Navy's new atomic submarine, the "Sea Wolf." The prototype of the engine used in the Nautilus, now under construction, is now under test at Arco, Idaho.----

The working part of the prototype, namely the hull section and a submergence tank, was shown quite clearly in the contemporary film "The Atom Goes To Sea" produced by General Electric. In that film, the structure is shown being "launched" by being moved from outside the sphere, where it was constructed, to the inside. (This film is widely available now on a number of DVD's.) Below, an illustration from the unclassified advertising / PR booklet titled "Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory" published by General Electric ca. 1958.


The caption for the above photo is as follows: "Hull and submergence tank for the SIR prototype were installed in the West Milton sphere." Note- while numerous photos of the interior of the Westinghouse / Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory STR (later S1W) prototype received fairly wide distribution by wire at the time, photos either inside or outside SIR / S1G were far less well distributed due to GE's essentially playing catch-up with this plant... Westinghouse being first got it all the glory.

This author is a graduate of the Naval Nuclear Power Training Unit, Ballston Spa, New York which trained at the Kesselring Site. That was some years back; at that time, Nuclear Field "A" schools and the Naval Nuclear Power School were entirely in Orlando, Florida, with prototype training sites in New York, Idaho, and Connecticut (the South Carolina facility was only being begun then.)

APR congratulates everyone at the site - these proud men and women constantly, tirelessly perform jobs that no one really ever gets to hear or know about until milestones like that reached with the 50,000th graduate come to light.

10:15 PM Eastern 5/30/2012
ATOMIC POWER REVIEW
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Saturday, 26 May 2012

The 106th Carnival of Nuclear Bloggers

Posted on 19:30 by Unknown
Atomic Power Review is proud to present the 106th Carnival of Nuclear Bloggers - a weekly feature that rotates between a number of the best pro-nuclear blogs in the English-language blogosphere. This feature has become well known in pro-nuclear circles as the best weekly location to get a finger on the pulse of the nuclear energy world.

APR Note: This week was to have been hosted at NEI Nuclear Notes, but due to a last minute problem APR has picked it up. This will explain any confusion folks may have when looking for the Carnival over at NEI's well known site.

Even though it's short notice, there's no way I'm going to let you in to the Carnival without showing you some completely obscure piece of equipment and asking you to tell me what it is - hoping all the while that you do NOT skim to the bottom of the post in order to find out what it is before you've perused the Carnival entries. We consider that cheating around here. So, then, I ask you... "What is this?"


You can click the picture to enlarge it. The print on the photo says "welding machine" - so if you guess "welding machine" you get nothing. What might this welding machine be for? You might be able to guess that, but I bet you won't be able to guess who manufactured this thing. Whatever the case - time to put that in the back of your mind for now and visit the 106th Carnival!

--------------------

ROD ADAMS - ATOMIC INSIGHTS

Macfarlane is not qualified to be Chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Dr. Allison Macfarlane, an associate professor at George Mason University, with a PhD in Geology from MIT, has been nominated by President Obama to be both a Commissioner and the new Chairman of the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Agency. If the President does not change his mind, that decision alone will be enough to turn me into a fervent supporter of anyone BUT Obama. If the Senate confirms Dr. Macfarlane for the increasingly important post, it will be enough to make me start investigating ways to become a citizen of another country.

--------------------

MEREDITH ANGWIN - YES VERMONT YANKEE

Planned Disruption at NRC Meeting

The NRC yearly review of Vermont Yankee gave the plant the highest marks. The NRC yearly meeting about Vermont Yankee held in Brattleboro. In contrast to the review, the meeting was a lesson in the successful politics of intimidation. The post at Yes Vermont Yankee includes a two-minute video.

--------------------

STEVE SKUTNIK - THE NEUTRON ECONOMY

A closer look at Jaczko's replacement

With the sudden departure of NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko and President Obama's rapid nomination of Allison MacFarlane to fill the role, what does this mean for the NRC (and the nuclear industry writ large)? Ultimately, it's a mixed bag.

--------------------

LESLIE CORRICE - THE HIROSHIMA SYNDROME

Tokyo shoots itself in the foot again!
(See May 25th entry)

As if Tokyo's government hasn't got enough public image problems, now they attack the findings of the World Health Organization on their estimates of the radiological impact of the F. Daiichi accident releases. What's mind boggling is WHO used the data supplied to them by Tokyo last September! So what if WHO crunched the numbers differently?

--------------------

STEVE APLIN - CANADIAN ENERGY ISSUES

Nuclear management in Ontario: the central lesson

Over ten short years from the early 1970s to the early 80s, Ontario became the most nuclearized jurisdiction in North America. During that period, Ontario was the proving ground for a unique reactor technology, CANDU, based on natural, unenriched,
uranium fuel and heavy water moderator, arranged in horizontal individual pressure tubes, thereby eliminating the need for large cast pressure vessels. CANDU quickly became Ontario's biggest energy source, out-generating all other sources combined. This domestic success was the springboard for international sales. CANDU construction projects in South Korea, China, and Rumania set the standard for multi-unit stations, based on proven designs, built on time and on budget. Steve Aplin argues that this amazing and unsung achievement is on the verge of being repeated, and all because painful but important management lessons from previous projects have been taken into account.

--------------------

GAIL MARCUS - NUKE POWER TALK

Too Cheap to Meter: 2

At Nuke Power Talk, Gail Marcus follows up on her last blog on the history of the "Too Cheap to Meter" statement with further reflection on whether it is possible or desirable to have electricity that is too cheap to meter. Gail's second post was in response to numerous comments, some pointing to times and places where electricity has not been metered, or to a future where the marginal cost of electricity might be so low that metering it would cost more. She wonders, though, if people might approach electricity consumption as they do an all-you-can-eat buffet table!

--------------------

ANS NUCLEAR CAFE (submission by Paul Bowersox)

Reactions to NRC Chairman Jaczko resignation announcement

The resignation announcement of US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Gregory Jaczko earlier this week jolted the nuclear power industry and the ever-tumultuous political world of Washington, DC. Paul Bowersox at the ANS Nuclear Cafe lays out the reactions to the resignation and makes a foray into the popular Beltway pastime of "reading the tea leaves" regarding Chairman Jaczko's eventual successor at the NRC.

--------------------

DAN YURMAN - IDAHO SAMIZDAT

What advice would you give Allison Macfarlane?

At Idaho Samizdat, Dan Yurman asks readers to provide answers to the question of what they expect from the NRC Chairman's office.

Assume for the sake of discussion you are an adviser hired independently by Allison MacFarlane to provide unvarnished advice on how to succeed on the job assuming she is confirmed as Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

--------------------

BRIAN WANG - NEXT BIG FUTURE

Two articles this time from Brian;

Jackzo resigns but wants to leave only after a new appointment has been confirmed and there are calls for his immediate resignation

...and...

Nuclear Famine Fears Based on Faulty Assumptions.

There was a 19 page report that claims that a billion people who are undernourished would die if there was a nuclear war between India and Pakistan. This is based on a series of wrong assumptions. Starting with the beginning that nuclear bombs would set off firestorms in Indian and Pakistan cities the way one was set off in Hiroshima. Nagasaki did not have a firestorm. Hiroshima did not have rain for 27 days prior to its bombing and they had paper and wood buildings and a high builtup coverage of land and breakfast cookers. India and Pakistan have mostly burnt brick buildings that are not as flammable. No big city fires then almost no material getting into the Stratosphere. Therefore no temperature effect. The other assumptions are also wrong. There was a temperature drop after Mount Pinotubo with 30 million tons of aerosol in the Stratosphere which had temperature effect for about two years but no impact on agriculture or starvation. There is no need to make stuff up. A full exchange of nuclear weapons between India and Pakistan would kill about 20-50 million people and injure many more. There is no need for some weird fairy tales about climate effect and then starvation.

--------------------

That does it for this week's Carnival entries. As we can see, a vast majority of people have been discussing Chairman Jaczko's announcement of intent to resign when a replacement is confirmed; right in step with that is discussion surrounding the nominee to replace him, Allison Macfarlane. This story is not going to go away; I'd recommend reading up on it using all the links above so that you're not left behind as the story develops.

And now... what was that machine I showed you? That machine is a specially designed seal welding machine for use on Navy reactor plants.. although, it was for Navy reactor plants of long ago. This illustration comes from a 1959 advertisement. Here is the text next to the photo, which I did not show you:

"The design and development of automatic seal welding and cutting equipment for nuclear reactors is an important activity at United. One such development involved the design and manufacture of cutting and welding equipment using consumable inserts for the U.S. Navy submarine Triton (S4G). Equipment will cut and re-weld 11 inch diameter welds on the control rod drive mechanisms at various angles. A control unit provides automatic sequencing of welding operations and the design of the welding unit allows use in spaces as close as 1-3/4 inches from weld to adjacent mechanisms. Equipment can be operated with any or all control rod drive mechanisms in place and its reliability eliminates the necessity for radiographic inspection."

Below we see the other unit mentioned (one for welding the seals shown earlier; the one below is for cutting them.)


The manufacturer name was hinted at in the text - "United." This slightly improbable contributor to the early nuclear energy industry was the United Shoe Machinery Corporation, which had an Atomic Power Department that manufactured, for the AEC, various control rod drive mechanisms and auxiliaries as shown above. Below, United Shoe Machinery's factory with logo.


The above illustrations and text are from Nucleonics, May, 1959. But such trade magazines aren't the only mention of the United Shoe Machinery Corporation in APR's collection -- in fact, Admiral Rickover himself mentioned this company while making a presentation to the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy in March, 1957.

Admiral Rickover was describing new reactor plant designs for Naval use to the JCAE and showing various models of equipment as displays during the first session of testimony and questioning. In the midst of showing these models, the following brief exchange took place:

Adm. Rickover: "Here is a sample of the control drive mechanism for the radar picket submarine. It is being designed by the United Shoe Machinery Corp., of Beverly, Massachusetts."

Representative Durham: "Is the shoe man in this business too?"

Adm. Rickover: "The United Shoe Machinery Corp. is pretty good in developing mechanisms. You see, in the shoe business they have to use a lot of very complicated machinery. They are experienced in developing mechanisms. This gives you some idea of how we are spreading our development out."

Senator Jackson: "The Russians will have a terrible time trying to figure out just what the American corporations are doing if they just read the stock lists and try to make a decision."

Adm. Rickover: "That is right. We have companies such as Borg-Warner, Bendix and Aerojet making controls. We have all kinds of companies in our business."

So, while at first take a shoe manufacturer might seem the most unlikely contributor to primary reactor plant equipment, in fact when manufacturing capability was compared to need (or potential need) companies such as this came right to the top, and were probably only too glad to take contracts for what appeared at the time to be a limitless future market.

APR note: The "radar picket" that Rickover mentioned was in fact the USS Triton, with two S4G pressurized water reactors, also mentioned in United Shoe's advertising copy earlier.

--------------------

That's it for this 106th Carnival. I hope you've enjoyed it, and I look forward to next week's installment. Thanks to all of the contributors for all their effort.

10:30 PM Eastern 5/26/2012
ATOMIC POWER REVIEW
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Friday, 25 May 2012

An interesting week, to say the least.

Posted on 17:18 by Unknown
This has indeed been an interesting week for those who follow the news in nuclear energy. Here is a brief recap from my perspective.

NRC CHAIRMAN Gregory Jaczko announced this week that he would be resigning his post -- but only after a replacement was found. This announcement led to widespread glee in Republican-oriented quarters, widespread congratulation for "a job well done" in Democrat quarters, and in many minds an air of suspicion. The suspicion was that there might be something in the upcoming Inspector General's report that would force Jaczko to resign; indeed, there are further (unanswered) letters from the House Oversight Committee (in front of which the whole Commission testified not too long ago) about apparent untruths in Chairman Jaczko's testimony. Jaczko himself denies any such connection, instead indicating that it's time to move on, although that time will only come when a replacement is approved.

After only a very short time was allowed for speculation, the White House announced that its nominee would be one Dr. Allison MacFarlane. I don't think we need to speculate too much on what MacFarlane brings to the table; Rod Adams interviewed her for the Atomic Podcast radio show (I've been on this show twice, folks!) and has kindly provided me with a link. Click here to hear Rod Adams' interview of Dr. MacFarlane from a few years back.

We'll have to wait and see what happens in the confirmation process - but with Commissioner Svinicki up for reappointment, there's bound to be some tradeoff. (I happen to agree with one of the posters at Rod's podcast page - the White House should have picked Dr. Gail Marcus. But what do I know?) Click here for the earlier APR post on Jaczko's resignation; includes some interesting press releases.

--------------------

In other news, this week Westinghouse made a significant announcement that it had formed an alliance with an engineering firm, and with submarine builder Electric Boat, to work together toward winning some of the DOE funding available for SMR plant construction. With the Vogtle and Summer plant projects underway (as expected) the focus now seems to be shifting toward this chunk of DOE money, and to which consortium can best position itself to wind funding and construct actual hardware. More than one analyst, in more than one pursuit, has indicated to this author that the best bet for the next unit to be built in the United States would be an SMR and not a large commercial station - mainly for economic reasons. (That would have to mean that whichever SMR design gets built would have to be finished before TVA can complete Watts Bar 2 in order to be fully correct, by the way.) You can click here to see the APR post made on that topic this week, with lots of background.

--------------------

Some time ago, APR made two posts concerning a very serious fire on board a Russian nuclear submarine. Click here to read the first post, and click here to read the second. This week, unfortunately, we have another, more serious fire on a nuclear submarine to report - and this time it was ours.

Apparently the fire began on board USS Miami, SSN-755, at about 5:41 PM on May 23rd. The ship was in a drydock at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, Maine undergoing overhaul / refit; she had been there since March. No torpedoes were on board. The reactor had been shut down for two months, and the fire never threatened any of the systems used to operate or cool the reactor plant. (In other words, the fire remained forward of the reactor compartment's forward bulkhead, or in other words was limited to the operations compartment.) Having said that though the fire burned for an exceedingly long time since no firefighting water was available on board; according to reports this author has read, as many as twelve civilian fire agencies were called to assist. This author believes that the fire must have gotten into hull insulation in order to burn as hot and as long as reports seem to indicate; according to WNCT CBS Channel 9 (local to the area) the compartment was isolated completely and abandoned to cool down after the fire was out, and reentry prevented to avoid reflash. Later, this morning (Friday, 5/25) the ship was ventilated for hours to allow reentry for inspection. In all seven men were injured, and thankfully all have been released.

One would have to wonder if the ship can be economically rebuilt. The determining factors surely will be the cost to repair damage in the forward end of the ship (it appears that a large amount of equipment had been removed for work) balanced off against the amount of time the ship has left on its reactor core before refueling.

Why do I report on these things here? Simple - because these submarines are nuclear powered. Very often the public wants to know what has happened - REALLY happened - when events like this take place. When someone with sub experience says that it's possible to isolate the forward part of the ship so that the reactor plant isn't threatened, it carries weight. (Even though there are numerous stories out there right now repeating the Navy's statement to this effect, sometimes you have to either repeat it, or echo it, one more time.) This fire of course has nothing at all to do with the fact that the sub is nuclear powered and in fact from time to time shipyard fires like this one can and do happen on any and all classes of ship. The Navy has not released a cause for the fire yet, but anyone with experience will guess one thing first - welding. That would potentially cause sparks to jump to combustible material; even though the best possible precautions are ordered, sometimes they're not taken, or sometimes something happens which is totally unforeseen. We'll wait to see whether the Navy decides to rebuild and return the Miami to service, or decommission her and send her to NPSSRP (Nuclear Powered Ship and Submarine Recycling Program) early.

--------------------

Finally for this APR installment... a brief Op-Ed piece by yours truly. It won't take long.

The recent article posted on ANS Nuclear Cafe concerning spent fuel at Fukushima Daiichi, which cleared two rounds of peer review, and which also gained the (much appreciated) support and backing of NEI, has continued to receive a great amount of attention by anti-nuclear commenters everywhere ... and some opposition by persons claiming to be pro-nuclear as well. This is the best possible outcome; it has proven that the anti-nuclear crowd knows when it has been presented with fact rather than hyperbole and FUD (which is the anti-nuke's stock in trade) and it fights that whenever and wherever it is seen. Were it proven that the hyperbole and fear spread by paid anti-nuclear activists is based only on a few loosely associated facts, mostly misinterpreted, and strung together in a line of assumptions which taken together are so impossible as to be laughable, the anti-nuclear crowd would be minus its beloved fear .. and worse, perhaps minus its beloved FUNDING. That's right -- there's big money in being anti-nuclear. (We already know of one anti-nuclear activist "expert" that gets paid $82000 a year by a 501(c)3 non-profit; how would YOU like to be paid 82 G a year for being wrong 100% of the time?) Yep - we showed that they don't like being presented with fact. They do what they usually do, which is try to shout everything down in the comments. That's why it's important to get pro-nuclear articles out there and let the comments fall where they may. It's bad policy to try to fight to get our message out when it's buried in a string of hundreds of comments; LEAD with it and it'll get out! (And thanks to one friend, the story did get reprinted in Daily Kos where it gets even more exposure.) I hope all of us who are pro-nuclear bloggers learned something this week. I did.

8:15 PM Eastern 5/25/2012
ATOMIC POWER REVIEW
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Monday, 21 May 2012

Westinghouse forms alliance to get DOE SMR funding

Posted on 16:56 by Unknown
Press release below from Westinghouse Electric.

--------------------

Westinghouse, Burns & McDonnell and Electric Boat Collaborate in Applying for DOE SMR Funding Opportunity


ARLINGTON, Va., May 21, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Westinghouse Electric Company, Burns & McDonnell and General Dynamics Electric Boat will collaboratively team to support the Westinghouse Small Modular Reactor (SMR) application for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Small Modular Reactor Funding Opportunity.

Michael Anness, SMR product manager at Westinghouse Electric Company, announced the teaming arrangement today at the Platts SMR conference in Arlington, Va. "We are very pleased to welcome Burns & McDonnell and Electric Boat as members of our vendor team to support the Westinghouse Small Modular Reactor design effort, and the ultimate deployment of a Westinghouse SMR at Ameren Missouri's Callaway Energy Center," said Anness. "We feel that this collaboration is an excellent fit for the team and will tremendously enhance our capabilities to provide licensing, construction and operational certainty that no other U.S. SMR supplier applying for DOE investment funds can match."

"Developing and building these next-generation reactors is a transformative opportunity to create jobs and grow Missouri's economy, and we're thrilled that Missouri-based Burns & McDonnell will be playing an important role in this partnership," Missouri Governor Jay Nixon said. "Westinghouse's application has unequivocal support from the state of Missouri, all of our electric-utility providers, labor organizations, and our powerhouse research universities. Adding a world-class engineering firm like Burns & McDonnell to the team only makes our application stronger. We are extremely pleased that Westinghouse has turned to this landmark Missouri company for this pivotal role on the architectural and engineering team."

Department of Energy (DOE) SMR investment funds will be awarded to SMR projects that have the most potential and promise to be licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and achieve commercial operation by 2022. The cost-share agreements will span a five-year period and, subject to Congressional appropriations, provide a total investment of approximately $900 million, with at least 50 percent provided by private industry. Westinghouse submitted its application to the DOE last Friday, May 18, on behalf of the Ameren Missouri-led NexStart SMR Alliance. The addition of Electric Boat and Burns & McDonnell to the Westinghouse team will further support and provide additional confidence to the Westinghouse SMR Project in its pursuit of the DOE funding opportunity.

Burns & McDonnell, Missouri's oldest and largest engineering firm will provide architectural and engineering support to design the power systems of the class-leading 225 MWe Westinghouse SMR. The company's more than 110 years of experience with all generation types includes an expansive and broad wealth of knowledge and expertise in new plant design, existing plant upgrades, operating plant issues, and design and analysis of myriad complex systems.

Electric Boat has joined the Westinghouse-led team to provide modular design support, leveraging the expertise attained over more than 60 years of nuclear-powered submarine design and manufacturing to the benefit of commercial nuclear programs. Electric Boat's specialized expertise in modular design will facilitate the achievement of factory-build efficiencies never before seen in nuclear energy deployment.

The Westinghouse SMR is a 225 MWe integral pressurized water reactor (PWR), with all primary components located inside of the reactor vessel. It utilizes passive safety systems and proven components, as well as modular construction techniques – all realized and already licensed in the nuclear industry-leading AP1000® reactor - to achieve the highest level of safety and reduced number of components required. Westinghouse believes that this proven approach will provide licensing, construction and operational certainty that no other SMR supplier can match with competitive economics. For more information about the Westinghouse SMR, visit www.westinghousenuclear.com/smr/index.htm.

Westinghouse Electric Company, a group company of Toshiba Corporation (TKY:6502), is the world's pioneering nuclear energy company and is a leading supplier of nuclear plant products and technologies to utilities throughout the world. Westinghouse supplied the world's first pressurized water reactor in 1957 in Shippingport, Pa. Today, Westinghouse technology is the basis for approximately one-half of the world's operating nuclear plants.

Founded in 1898, Burns & McDonnell is a 100 percent employee-owned, full-service engineering, architecture, construction, environmental and consulting services firm. Burns & McDonnell is currently the 23rd largest AEC firm in the Engineering News-Record Top 500 ranking. The firm is among the leaders in many categories, including the No. 2 ranked firm in the Transmission & Distribution category. With the multidisciplinary expertise of more than 3,400 professionals in more than 30 regional, national and international offices, Burns & McDonnell plans, designs, permits, constructs and manages facilities worldwide with one mission in mind: to make its clients successful.

More information about General Dynamics is available on the Internet at www.gdeb.com.

SOURCE Westinghouse Electric Company

--------------------

This move certainly puts Westinghouse on an even footing with the Generation mPower team, made up of Babcock & Wilcox and Bechtel Corporation, in the SMR market.

7:55 PM Eastern 5/21/2012
ATOMIC POWER REVIEW

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

UPDATE VIA NEI / SmartBrief

This article in the Columbia Daily Tribune gives more background as to the alliance between Ameren and Westinghouse.

--------------------

UPDATE

Click here for a very detailed release (and separate pdf file presentation) from Ameren Missouri on the project to build a Westinghouse SMR at Callaway.

Click here for a very useful and detailed APR link list on the project.

8:15 PM 5/21/2012
Read More
Posted in | No comments

NRC Chairman Jaczko to resign

Posted on 11:33 by Unknown
Surprising news comes from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission today as NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko has indicated that he will resign from the NRC as soon as a successor is named. Below, the text of the press release from the NRC.

--------------------

Statement of NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko


After nearly eight years on the Commission, I am announcing my resignation as Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, effective upon the confirmation of my successor. My responsibility and commitment to safety will continue to be my paramount priority after I leave the Commission and until my successor is confirmed.

After an incredibly productive three years as Chairman, I have decided this is the appropriate time to continue my efforts to ensure public safety in a different forum. This is the right time to pass along the public safety torch to a new chairman who will keep a strong focus on carrying out the vital mission of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

During this last year alone, the agency has responded with an impressive focus on safety under my leadership to a number of diverse challenges including the accident at the Fukushima Da-ichi reactors in Japan, and a number of severe incidents at reactors in the United States ranging from flooding, an earthquake and tornados to damaged plant structures and steam generator problems. In addition to this vigilant oversight, together we identified and began to implement lessons learned from Fukushima and completed our rigorous safety reviews for the first new reactor licenses in 30 years.

Throughout my time on the Commission as both Chairman and Commissioner, the agency finalized regulations to ensure new reactors are designed to withstand an aircraft impact, completed the development and implementation of a safety culture policy statement, enhanced our focus on openness and transparency, and enhanced awareness of and worked to resolve some of the most long-standing generic issues facing the nuclear industry, including sump strainer issues and fire protection. Beyond the power reactor work, substantial progress was made in establishing a more transparent and effective oversight program for fuel cycle facilities. In addition, radioactive sources of concern are now fully protected with our new security regulations and source tracking system. We stand as a stronger and more decisive regulator now because of these years of efforts. I am truly humbled by the agency’s success.

Serving the American people as the Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has been an honor and privilege. The mission of this agency – protecting people and the environment, and providing for the common defense and security – could not be more clear, or more critical. Our collective focus on that mission was, I believe, one of the primary reasons the Nuclear Regulatory Commission was one of the best places to work in the federal government throughout my tenure. The highly talented and dedicated professional staff, including dozens who have served on my personal staff over the years, have been instrumental in fulfilling the agency’s mission.

I will always be grateful for the opportunity of having served alongside the staff for all of these years, and for all that we accomplished together. I am looking forward to bringing all I have learned from my work and focus on safety at this agency with me as I move forward.

--------------------

This announcement has been met with press releases by Senator Reid, and Congressman Markey (both Democrats) praising his tenure; by Congressman Darrell Issa (who led the quite public investigation into allegations of misconduct by the Chairman) indicating that this is a welcome change; and from the White House, diplomatically indicating that there will be fairly rapid moves to get a successor. Some organizations have also made releases; below is the text of Nuclear Energy Institute's release.

--------------------


Nuclear Energy Institute

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact:202.739.8000
For Release:May 21, 2012


Nuclear Energy Institute Comments on NRC Chairman Resignation

WASHINGTON, D.C.—The Nuclear Energy Institute’s Marvin Fertel, president and CEO, made the following remarks in reaction to NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko’s resignation from the commission:

“In the seven years that Chairman Jaczko has served as a member of the commission we recognized his commitment to set the highest standards for the safe operation of the nation’s 104 nuclear power plants and transparency throughout the nuclear regulatory framework.

“We have had differences with the chairman on how best to achieve our mutually shared safety goals. But to his credit we’ve always had open lines of communications and a willingness to respectfully discuss the issues. This has especially been the case over the past 13 months since the accident at the Fukushima plant in Japan. We wish the chairman the best in his future endeavors.

“We encourage the White House to expeditiously name a new chairman and take steps necessary to ensure that there is a full complement of commissioners at the NRC.”

--------------------

Atomic Power Review has had quite a number of posts on the situation between Chairman Jaczko and the other Commissioners;

Situation at the NRC (December 13, 2011)

House Oversight hearings - first take (December 14, 2011)

The issue resurfaces in regards to Svinicki reappointment to NRC (April 19, 2012)

--------------------

Author's Opinion: This move is probably being made at the right time. Chairman Jaczko seems quite against nuclear energy, against the discovery of a location for a nuclear waste repository, and against normal give and take committee function. With four plants under construction, a new round of SMR funding underway (and very likely operating SMR plants in the next decade or so) this is not the time to have a person with an anti-nuclear agenda at the helm of the nuclear regulator in this country. While safety is (and always has been) paramount at the NRC, it is ludicrous to think that any one Commissioner might have an upper hand in safety culture beliefs - and this is the leg Jaczko stood on to explain his behavior and decision making. It may also be no mistake that this occurs right as we get into the stretch of election season.

We will have further releases here as they're made available.

2:30 PM Eastern 5/21/2012
ATOMIC POWER REVIEW
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Sunday, 20 May 2012

Carnival 105 at ANS Nuclear Cafe

Posted on 15:16 by Unknown
The 105th Carnival of Nuclear Energy Bloggers is up this week at the ANS Nuclear Cafe site, and folks - you do NOT want to miss this one.

Click here to get to Carnival 105.

There has been no shortage whatsoever lately of wild misrepresentation of the situation at the Fukushima Daiichi site in Japan, in particular surrounding the condition of spent fuel at the site. This Carnival delivers a thorough, well reasoned and researched counter to those opinions that seek to fan the flame of fear; several posts linked from the Carnival deliver different views of the situation including a major effort that appeared first at ANS Nuclear Cafe, and which later appeared at Daily Kos.

If you've wondered what was on the minds of pro-nuclear insiders at any point all you would have to have done was to check in on the weekly Carnival, wherever it was. If you have wondered but not looked, why not start now?

6:15 PM Eastern 5/20/2012
ATOMIC POWER REVIEW
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Wednesday, 16 May 2012

Fukushima spent fuel pools: Not the major issue

Posted on 05:24 by Unknown
Those of you who have been waiting for me to say something about these many varied articles and interviews floating around the broadcast world and internet predicting doom because of the supposed shaky situation of the spent fuel at Fukushima Daiichi have completed your wait. What's significant is that I didn't say it here.

You can find my latest work at the American Nuclear Society's ANS NUCLEAR CAFE site. Click here to access my article. I will immediately add that I not only consulted a number of documents to write this, but also had help in the peer review process from many great people (who are listed at the ANS page - I made sure they were not left out. I hope I got everyone.) Steve Aplin, who was not involved until the end of the process deserves mention as well as he read over the final draft in addition to the others on the list.

I hope you enjoy it - and further, I hope that this kind of thing continues to head off the unwarranted fear being spread among the public by paid anti-nuclear activists who profit handsomely at the expense of your nerves.

8:25 AM Eastern 5/16/2012


Read More
Posted in ANS, fukushima daiichi, spent fuel, spent fuel pool, TEPCO | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Steam Generators: Design and details
    A recent NRC blog post ( see here ) brings up a matter that has come into focus of late at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station in Californ...
  • The 136th Carnival of Nuclear Bloggers
    I find myself on this December 23rd, making the Atomic Power Review entry hosting the 136th Carnival, thinking about all of the great achiev...
  • Nuclear Icebreakers 101
    An addendum for National Nuclear Science Week - Day 3 In the previous post I gave the briefest overview of the history of the Russian fleet ...
  • Xenon / Fukushima Daiichi No. 2 - Thursday afternoon update
    The information at present from TEPCO echoes that printed here this morning. Here is the latest TEPCO analysis: -We found a possibility to d...
  • The effect of big media: A real conversation
    I recently had a conversation with a friend of mine that interestingly turned nuclear. She's married, mother of one beautiful nine month...
  • INFOCAST Press Release: Waste Confidence Conference in October
    Press Release below from Infocast.  See link button on right sidebar to access the Infocast site page covering this timely and relevant conf...
  • The 84th Carnival of Nuclear Bloggers
    Once again Atomic Power Review is proud to host the rotating Carnival of Nuclear Bloggers - this, the 84th edition. This feature travels aro...
  • Carnival of Nuclear Bloggers comes to APR
    60th Carnival of Nuclear Bloggers Atomic Power Review is very proud to host, for the first time, the rotating Carnival. This feature present...
  • 60th anniversary of EBR-I power generation
    Yesterday and today mark an important event in nuclear energy history; these two days are the span during which the EBR-1 reactor plant, whi...
  • SCE Demands Mitsubishi Allow Contractually Mandated Audit
    The following press release was received last evening from Southern California Edison. ---------- Media Contact: Media Relations, (626) 302-...

Categories

  • " fukushima daiichi"
  • "accident"
  • "alloy"
  • "ameren"
  • "american nuclear society"
  • "annealing"
  • "anniversary"
  • "ans"
  • "anti-nuclear"
  • "AP1000"
  • "arco"
  • "areva"
  • "asn"
  • "associated press" "NRC" "NEI"
  • "atomic journal"
  • "babcock"
  • "blackout"
  • "bloggers"
  • "boron"
  • "brazil"
  • "breeder reactor"
  • "breeder"
  • "browns ferry"
  • "browns ferry" "nine mile point"
  • "BWR"
  • "calhoun"
  • "callaway"
  • "carnival"
  • "chernobyl"
  • "china"
  • "chubu electric" "hamaoka"
  • "chubu" "hamaoka"
  • "chubu" "hamaoka" "tepco" "fukushima daiichi"
  • "chubu" "kyushu" "nisa"
  • "COL"
  • "commissioners"
  • "containment"
  • "contaminated"
  • "cooling"
  • "cooper" "ft calhoun" "flood" "missouri river"
  • "core damage"
  • "criticality"
  • "davis-besse"
  • "delta IV"
  • "dresden" "boiling water reactor" "containment"
  • "dry dock"
  • "dry well"
  • "earth day"
  • "earthquake"
  • "EBR"
  • "ebwr"
  • "education"
  • "elk river"
  • "embrittlement"
  • "enclosure"
  • "energy policy"
  • "equipment"
  • "fabrication"
  • "fermi"
  • "fire"
  • "flood"
  • "frontline"
  • "ft calhoun"
  • "ft calhoun" "oppd" "flood"
  • "ft st vrain"
  • "fukushima daiichi"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "BWR"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "nisa" "tepco"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "dry well" "containment" "pressure vessel"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "iaea"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "kurion" "areva"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa" "genkai" "pressure vessel"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa" "jaif"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa" "japan"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa" "jsc" "road map" "recovery"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa" "spent fuel" "pool"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nitrogen"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "robot" "video"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "tokai" "japco" "iaea"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "tomari" "hokkaido"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "tsunami"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "video"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "video" "youtube"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "TMI" "public opinion" "survey"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "video"
  • "fukushima daiichi" 7 8 plants economic plan TEPCO
  • "fukushima daiichi" cooling water release sea ocean nuclear reactor accident NISA TEPCO pit trench tunnel
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident contaminated water barge Suzuran Rosatom TEPCO
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident contaminated water sea radwaste condensers nitrogen hydrogen inert
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident earthquake onagawa TEPCO tohoku BWR nitrogen
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident IAEA TEPCO update briefing temperatures pressures
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident japan update color dye containment fabric update
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident leakage sea seawater contamination tunnel trench cable pit
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident liquid glass sodium silicate TEPCO
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident nitrogen hydrogen inert dry well drywell
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident nitrogen inert radiolytic radiolysis hydrogen
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident polymer leak concrete contaminated contamination reactor pressure vessel containment cooling
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident seawater contamination iodine tunnel trench TEPCO NISA JAIF
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident site update status project future
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident sodium silicate liquid glass diagram drawing perspective pipe tunnel trench contamination sea seawater
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident TEPCO NISA JAIF update
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident update TEPCO JAIF NISA
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident water leakage contamination workers found dead
  • "fukushima"
  • "gas cooled"
  • "genkai"
  • "genkai" "embrittlement" "brittle" "pressure vessel"
  • "genkai" "kyushu"
  • "hack job"
  • "hallam"
  • "head"
  • "hearing"
  • "hearings"
  • "higashidori"
  • "hitachi"
  • "HNPF"
  • "hurricane"
  • "hydrogen"
  • "IAEA"
  • "icebreaker"
  • "IFR"
  • "INES"
  • "injection"
  • "irene"
  • "irrelevant"
  • "jaczko"
  • "jaczko" "NRC"
  • "JAIF"
  • "japan"
  • "kurion"
  • "kyushu"
  • "laguna verde"
  • "lenin"
  • "licensing"
  • "loop"
  • "lunch"
  • "marcoule"
  • "mark I"
  • "melt"
  • "meltdown"
  • "mexico"
  • "mitsubishi"
  • "MK I" "containment" "suppression" "youtube" "video"
  • "mPower"
  • "mPower" "Bechtel" "TVA" "babcock"
  • "national nuclear science week"
  • "nei"
  • "new nuclear"
  • "NISA"
  • "nitrogen"
  • "no 5"
  • "no 6"
  • "north anna"
  • "NRC"
  • "NRTS"
  • "nuclear aftershocks"
  • "nuclear energy institute"
  • "nuclear history"
  • "nuclear icebreaker"
  • "office for nuclear regulation"
  • "op-ed"
  • "op-ed" "carnival"
  • "op-ed" "fukushima daiichi"
  • "opinion"
  • "oversight"
  • "palisades"
  • "pbs"
  • "peer review"
  • "poll"
  • "PRA"
  • "press"
  • "pressure vessel"
  • "pressurized thermal shock"
  • "primary to secondary leak"
  • "PTS"
  • "public attitudes"
  • "PWR"
  • "RBMK-1000"
  • "RBMK-1500"
  • "RBMK-2400"
  • "RBMK"
  • "reactor safety"
  • "reading list"
  • "recriticality"
  • "Reid"
  • "reporting"
  • "restart"
  • "risk"
  • "robot"
  • "rod adams" "glenn williams" "interview" "atomic show" "the street"
  • "safety"
  • "san onofre"
  • "sarry"
  • "SBO"
  • "sheldon station"
  • "shippingport"
  • "SMR"
  • "solar"
  • "songs"
  • "south africa"
  • "south texas project"
  • "spent fuel"
  • "SSBN"
  • "steam generator"
  • "steam generators"
  • "steel"
  • "stress tests"
  • "submarine"
  • "support"
  • "Svinicki"
  • "sylcor"
  • "sylvania-corning"
  • "TEPCO"
  • "tepco" "tohoku" "kyushu" "japan"
  • "TMI"
  • "tokyo electric"
  • "Toshiba"
  • "twitter"
  • "UK"
  • "update"
  • "vermont yankee"
  • "vessel"
  • "video"
  • "virgil c summer"
  • "virginia"
  • "vogtle"
  • "wash-1250"
  • "WASH"
  • "westinghouse"
  • "westinghouse" "AP1000" "NRC"
  • "xenon"
  • "youtube"
  • ANO
  • ANS
  • arkansas nuclear one
  • Babcock
  • brittle fracture
  • brookhaven
  • carnival
  • crystal river
  • decommissioning
  • earthquake
  • enriched uranium
  • Entergy
  • fintan dunne
  • FirstEnergy
  • fresno
  • fuel elements
  • fukushima daiichi
  • higashidori
  • hurricane
  • hurricanes
  • industrial accident
  • INES
  • kashiwazaki kariwa TEPCO earthquake
  • kenya
  • license amendment
  • MHI
  • mitsubishi
  • mPower
  • NEI
  • northern fleet
  • nrc
  • nuclear electricity project
  • nuclear history
  • nuclear submarines
  • onagawa tohoku leak earthquake
  • OSHA
  • oyster creek
  • palisades
  • press release
  • pressurized thermal shock
  • PTS
  • retire
  • russian navy
  • san onofre
  • sandy
  • sce
  • sherrell r greene
  • shutdown
  • SMR
  • socal ed
  • songs
  • southern california edison
  • spent fuel
  • spent fuel pool
  • spent fuel pools
  • status
  • steam generator
  • steam generators
  • surry
  • sustainable energy today
  • sylcor
  • sylvania-corning
  • TEPCO
  • tohoku electric power higashidori onagawa LOOP fuel pool cooling
  • tokyo electric power company
  • unusual event

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (71)
    • ▼  October (5)
      • South Korea: Cables fail tests; Government suing ...
      • SCE Requests Arbitration in SONGS Steam Generator ...
      • SCE Demands Mitsubishi Allow Contractually Mandate...
      • Resin-based solution to Fukushima water problems
      • SCE Demands Reimbursement from Mitsubishi for San ...
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (13)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2012 (159)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (15)
    • ►  June (16)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (18)
  • ►  2011 (270)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (20)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (17)
    • ►  July (23)
    • ►  June (24)
    • ►  May (44)
    • ►  April (78)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile