Mitsubishi Tech Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 30 July 2012

Chicago Bridge & Iron buys Shaw Group

Posted on 13:48 by Unknown
First in this story is the press release from the Shaw Group.
--------------------

Shaw Announces Agreement to Be Acquired by CB&I


BATON ROUGE, La.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jul. 30, 2012-- The Shaw Group Inc. (NYSE: SHAW) today announced it has signed a definitive merger agreement with CB&I (NYSE: CBI) under which CB&I will acquire Shaw in a cash and stock transaction valued at approximately $3 billion.

Under the terms of the agreement, CB&I will acquire Shaw for $46.00 per share in cash and stock. Shaw’s shareholders will receive $41.00 in cash and $5.00 in CB&I equity (0.12883 shares based on an agreed upon recent average stock price of $38.81 per share) for each share of Shaw stock at closing.

The combination of CB&I and Shaw will create one of the world’s largest engineering and construction companies focused on the global energy industry. Both companies believe this agreement will create value through a combined company with broader participation in a robust energy market.

“I am extremely proud of the company we have built and operated for the last 25 years. Shaw’s leadership position in the power, environmental and infrastructure industries will complement CB&I’s current business, and I am confident that, together, these two companies will continue to excel,” said J.M. Bernhard Jr., chairman, president and chief executive officer of Shaw. “While Shaw has been growing in our business and has many opportunities ahead of us, we believe this transaction is in the best interest of and creates significant value for our shareholders, our employees and our customers.”

CB&I plans to operate Shaw as a business sector under the brand name CB&I Shaw to enable the company to retain Shaw’s brand equity and to allow the combined organization to capitalize on the resources, capacity and best practices from each group for the benefit of all stakeholders.

“This is a highly compelling transaction that will create significant value for our shareholders,” said Philip K. Asherman, president and chief executive officer of CB&I. “Shaw is a great company with tremendously talented employees. By adding them into the CB&I family, we will become fully diversified across the entire energy sector. We will have the capacity and the expertise to provide our clients with the full range of solutions, wherever they are in the world. Most importantly, we will have the experience and relationships necessary to successfully meet and exceed our clients’ expectations.”

The transaction has been approved unanimously by the boards of directors of both companies. CB&I will finance the acquisition using cash on the balance sheets of both companies, along with debt financing pursuant to commitments from Bank of America and Credit Agricole. Closing of the transaction is subject to regulatory approvals, the approval of Shaw and CB&I shareholders and other conditions. The transaction currently is expected to close during the first calendar quarter of 2013.

Following the acquisition, Mr. Bernhard plans to pursue new business and public service interests.

Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC is acting as Shaw’s exclusive financial advisor, and Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. and Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrère & Denègre, L.L.P. are acting as legal advisors.

About Shaw:

The Shaw Group Inc. (NYSE:SHAW) is a leading global provider of engineering, construction, technology, fabrication, remediation and support services for clients in the energy, chemicals, environmental, infrastructure and emergency response industries. A Fortune 500 company with fiscal year 2011 annual revenues of $5.9 billion, Shaw has approximately 27,000 employees around the world and is a power sector industry leader according to Engineering News-Record’s list of Top 500 Design Firms. For more information, please visit Shaw’s website at www.shawgrp.com.

About CB&I:

CB&I (NYSE: CBI) engineers and constructs some of the world’s largest energy infrastructure projects. With premier process technology from its Lummus Technology business, proven EPC expertise, and unrivaled storage tank experience, CB&I executes projects from concept to completion. Safely. Reliably. Globally. For more information, visit www.cbi.com.

Important Information For Investors And Shareholders

This communication does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or a solicitation of any vote or approval. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. (“CB&I”) will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) a registration statement on Form S-4 that will include a proxy statement of The Shaw Group Inc. (“Shaw”) that also constitutes a prospectus of CB&I. CB&I and Shaw also plan to file other documents with the SEC regarding the proposed agreement. A definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus will be mailed to shareholders of Shaw. INVESTORS AND SECURITY HOLDERS OF SHAW ARE URGED TO READ THE JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS THAT WILL BE FILED WITH THE SEC CAREFULLY AND IN THEIR ENTIRETY WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION. Investors and shareholders will be able to obtain free copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus and other documents containing important information about CB&I and Shaw, once such documents are filed with the SEC, through the website maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of the documents filed with the SEC by CB&I will be available free of charge on CB&I’s internet website at www.cbi.com under the tab “Investor Relations” and then under the tab “SEC Documents” or by contacting CB&I’s Investor Relations Department at 832-513-1200. Copies of the documents filed with the SEC by Shaw will be available free of charge on Shaw’s internet website at www.shawgrp.com under the tab “Investor Relations” and then under the tab “SEC Filings” or by contacting Shaw’s Investor Relations Department at 225-987-7372.

Participants in the Solicitation

CB&I, Shaw, their respective directors and certain of their executive officers may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from the shareholders of Shaw in connection with the proposed transaction. Information about the directors and executive officers of Shaw is set forth in Shaw’s proxy statement for its 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, which was filed with the SEC on December 15, 2012. Information about the directors and executive officers of CB&I is set forth in CB&I’s proxy statement for its 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, which was filed with the SEC on March 22, 2012. Other information regarding the participants in the proxy solicitation and a description of their direct and indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, will be contained in the joint proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant materials to be filed with the SEC when they become available.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements and information about our current and future prospects and our operations and financial results, which are based on currently available information. The forward looking statements include assumptions about our operations, such as cost controls and market conditions, and the proposed merger (including its benefits, results, effects and timing) that may not be realized. Risks and uncertainties related to the merger include, but are not limited to: the failure of the shareholders of CB&I or the shareholders of Shaw to approve the merger; the risk that the conditions to the closing of the merger are not satisfied; the risk that regulatory approvals required for the merger are not obtained or are obtained subject to conditions that are not anticipated; potential adverse reactions or changes to business relationships resulting from the announcement or completion of the merger; uncertainties as to the timing of the merger; competitive responses to the proposed merger; costs and difficulties related to the integration of Shaw’s businesses and operations with CB&I’s business and operations; the inability to or delay in obtaining cost savings and synergies from the merger; unexpected costs, charges or expenses resulting from the merger; litigation relating to the merger; the inability to retain key personnel; and any changes in general economic and/or industry specific conditions Actual future results and financial performance could vary significantly from those anticipated in such statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, the occurrence of certain events or otherwise.

Among the factors that could cause future events or transactions to differ from those we expect are those risks discussed under Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended November 30, 2011, February 29, 2012, and May 31, 2012, and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Please read our “Risk Factors” and other cautionary statements contained in these filings.

As a result of these risks and others, actual results could vary significantly from those anticipated in this press release, and our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Source: The Shaw Group Inc.

The Shaw Group Inc.
Gentry Brann, 225-987-7372
gentry.brann@shawgrp.com


"Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Statements in this press release regarding SHAW GROUP INC's business which are not historical facts are "forward-looking statements" that involve risks and uncertainties. For a discussion of such risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements, see "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Report or Form 10-K for the most recently ended fiscal year.

--------------------

Bloomberg's article and analysis - click here.

Interesting analysis on Investopedia - click here.

--------------------

Chicago Bridge & Iron will operate the acquired company as CB&I Shaw. Below is the complete CB&I press release:


CB&I Announces Agreement to Acquire the Shaw Group

A powerful combination – Creating a leading Energy Focused EPC Company globally

THE WOODLANDS, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jul. 30, 2012-- CB&I (NYSE: CBI) announced today that it has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Shaw Group (NYSE: SHAW), a Fortune 500 company primarily focused on serving clients in the power generation and government services sector. The acquisition is expected to close in early 2013.

Combining CB&I and Shaw will create one of the most complete energy focused technology, engineering, procurement, fabrication, construction, maintenance, and associated services companies in the world. With a global workforce of nearly 50,000 employees, backlog of over $28 billion, and engineering and fabrication facilities strategically located on all continents, the company will have the critical mass necessary to execute the largest energy infrastructure projects now and into the future.

"This is a highly compelling transaction that we believe will create significant value for our shareholders,” said Philip K. Asherman, President and CEO of CB&I. “Shaw is a great company with tremendously talented employees. By adding them into the CB&I family, we will become fully diversified across the entire energy sector, from Power Generation to LNG, from Refining to Gas Processing, from Offshore to Oil Sands, and beyond. We will have the capabilities and the expertise to provide our clients with the full range of solutions, wherever they are in the world. Most important, we will have the experience and relationships necessary to successfully meet and exceed our clients’ expectations.”

CB&I will acquire Shaw for $46.00 per share in cash and stock. Shareholders will receive $41.00 in cash and $5.00 in CB&I equity (0.12883 shares based on an agreed upon recent average stock price of $38.81 per share) for each share of Shaw stock at closing. CB&I will use cash on the balance sheets of both companies, along with approximately $1.9 billion in debt to finance the acquisition. Based on the estimated cash position of Shaw at the end of its August 31, 2012 fiscal year, this equates to an enterprise value of approximately $2.0 billion. Using consensus estimates, the implied transaction multiple is 7.0x Shaw’s fiscal 2012 adjusted EBITDA. First year earnings per share are anticipated to be double-digit accretive before transaction related costs.

“I am extremely proud of the company we have built and operated for the last 25 years. Shaw’s leadership position in the power, environmental and infrastructure industries will complement CB&I’s current business, and I am confident that, together, these two companies will continue to excel,” said J.M. Bernhard Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Shaw. “While Shaw has been growing in our business and has many opportunities ahead of us, we believe this transaction is in the best interest of and creates significant value for our shareholders, our employees and our customers.”

The acquisition of Shaw Group by CB&I has been unanimously approved by the Directors of the respective company’s boards. The transaction is subject to approval by each company’s shareholders, along with the receipt of certain regulatory approvals and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. Philip K. Asherman will continue as President and CEO of the combined company.

CB&I plans to operate Shaw as a business sector under the brand name CB&I Shaw. This will enable the company to retain Shaw’s brand equity, particularly in the power industry, and it will allow the combined organization to capitalize on the resources, capabilities, and best practices from each group for the benefit of all stakeholders.

Bank of America Merrill Lynch is acting as the financial advisor to CB&I, and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz is acting as the Company’s legal counsel.

KEY TAKEAWAYS
• Create one of the most complete Energy Focused company in the world
• Broaden relationships with clients and partners worldwide
• Expand in growth areas including power generation from nuclear, gas, coal and associated retrofit
• Diversify further, adding greater revenue and earnings stability from Plant Services, F&M and E&I businesses
• Expected to be EPS Accretive in 2013 and beyond
• Committed to deleveraging and maintaining a strong balance sheet
• Add skilled resources globally, notably engineers and field personnel and fabrication capacity

NOTICE

CB&I will host a conference call Monday, July 30, 2012 at 7:30 a.m. CDT (8:30 a.m. EDT) to discuss the acquisition.

The webcast will be available at www.CBI.comInvestor Relations. Please log on to the website at least 15 minutes prior to the start of the call to register and download any necessary audio software.

The conference call also can be accessed by telephone at 1-800-301-8321 (U.S.) or +1-706-634-2259 (outside the U.S.). ID#: 16199456.

A replay of the conference call will be available at www.CBI.comInvestor Relations or by calling 1-855-859-2056 (U.S.) or +1-404-537-3406 (outside the U.S.) through October 31, 2012. ID#: 16199456.

ABOUT CB&I

CB&I (NYSE:CBI) engineers and constructs some of the world’s largest energy infrastructure projects. With premier process technology, proven EPC expertise, and unrivaled storage tank experience, CB&I executes projects from concept to completion. Safely. Reliably. Globally. For more information, visit www.CBI.com.

ABOUT SHAW

The Shaw Group Inc. (NYSE: SHAW) is a leading global provider of engineering, construction, technology, fabrication, remediation and support services for clients in the energy, chemicals, environmental, infrastructure and emergency response industries. A Fortune 500 company with fiscal year 2011 annual revenues of $5.9 billion, Shaw has approximately 27,000 employees around the world and is a power sector industry leader according to Engineering News-Record’s list of Top 500 Design Firms. For more information, please visit Shaw’s website at www.shawgrp.com.

Important Information For Investors And Shareholders

This communication does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or a solicitation of any vote or approval. In connection with the proposed transaction, Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. (“CB&I”) expects to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) a registration statement on Form S-4 that will include a joint proxy statement of The Shaw Group Inc. (“Shaw”) and CB&I that also constitutes a prospectus of CB&I. CB&I and Shaw also plan to file other documents with the SEC regarding the proposed transaction. A definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus will be mailed to shareholders of Shaw and CB&I. INVESTORS AND SECURITY HOLDERS OF SHAW AND CB&I ARE URGED TO READ THE JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS (INCLUDING ANY AMENDMENTS OR SUPPLEMENTS THERETO) AND OTHER DOCUMENTS THAT WILL BE FILED WITH THE SEC CAREFULLY AND IN THEIR ENTIRETY WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION. Investors and shareholders will be able to obtain free copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents filed by CB&I and Shaw, once such documents are filed with the SEC, through the website maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of the documents filed with the SEC by CB&I will be available free of charge on CB&I’s internet website at www.cbi.com under the tab “Investor Relations” and then under the tab “SEC Documents” or by contacting CB&I’s Investor Relations Department at 832-513-1200. Copies of the documents filed with the SEC by Shaw will be available free of charge on Shaw’s internet website at www.Shawgrp.com under the tab “Investor Relations” and then under the tab “SEC Filings” or by contacting Shaw’s Investor Relations Department at 225-987-7372.

Participants in the Solicitation

CB&I, Shaw, and their respective directors and executive officers may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from the shareholders of Shaw and CB&I in connection with the proposed transaction. Information about the directors and executive officers of Shaw is set forth in Shaw’s proxy statement for its 2011 annual meeting of shareholders, which was filed with the SEC on December 15, 2011. Information about the directors and executive officers of CB&I is set forth in CB&I’s proxy statement for its 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, which was filed with the SEC on March 22, 2012. Other information regarding the participants in the proxy solicitation and a description of their direct and indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, will be contained in the joint proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant materials to be filed with the SEC in connection with the proposed transaction if and when they become available.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements and information about our current and future prospects and our operations and financial results, which are based on currently available information. Actual future results and financial performance could vary significantly from those anticipated in such statements. The forward looking statements include assumptions about our operations, such as cost controls and market conditions, and the proposed merger (including its benefits, results, effects and timing) that may not be realized. Risks and uncertainties related to the merger include, but are not limited to: the failure of the shareholders of CB&I or the shareholders of Shaw to approve the merger; the risk that the conditions to the closing of the merger are not satisfied; the risk that regulatory approvals required for the merger are not obtained or are obtained subject to conditions that are not anticipated; potential adverse reactions or changes to business relationships resulting from the announcement or completion of the merger; uncertainties as to the timing of the merger; competitive responses to the proposed merger; costs and difficulties related to the integration of Shaw’s businesses and operations with CB&I’s business and operations; the inability to obtain, or delays in obtaining, cost savings and synergies from the merger; unexpected costs, charges or expenses resulting from the merger; litigation relating to the merger; the inability to retain key personnel; and any changes in general economic and/or industry specific conditions. Additional factors that could cause future results or events to differ from those we expect are those risks discussed under Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012, and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Please read our “Risk Factors” and other cautionary statements contained in these filings.

We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, the occurrence of certain events or otherwise. As a result of these risks and others, actual results could vary significantly from those anticipated in this press release, and our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.


Source: CB&I

CB&I
Investors:
Christi Thoms, +1 832 513 1200
Director, Investor Relations
Investor-relations@cbi.com
or
Media:
Visit www.CBI.com to access an online media kit regarding the acquisition.

--------------------

4:48 PM Eastern 7/30/2012
ATOMIC POWER REVIEW
Read More
Posted in | No comments

B&W mPower release from the Governor Bob McDonnell of Virginia

Posted on 12:55 by Unknown
Below is a press release APR has received courtesy of Jeff Caldwell at the Governor's office, Virginia.

--------------------

Commonwealth of Virginia

Office of Governor Bob McDonnell


Governor McDonnell Applauds Opening of B&W mPowerTM Fuel Technology Center in Virginia

Facility will Create Twelve New Jobs and Generate Additional Local Manufacturing Business in Lynchburg Area

LYNCHBURG – Governor McDonnell is pleased to join The Babcock & Wilcox Company (B&W), one of America’s foremost developers of clean energy technology, in announcing the opening of the B&W mPowerTM Fuel Technology Center (FTC), an advanced nuclear fuel fabrication technology development facility in Lynchburg, VA. B&W’s Fuel Technology Center in Lynchburg will bring a dozen new direct jobs to the region, and benefit the local economy by fabricating most of the custom equipment for the facility locally. Importantly, it will help lay the foundation for significant potential investment and job growth in Virginia in the future, to serve both the U.S. and global energy markets. Senior Economic Advisor Bob Sledd represented Governor McDonnell at the official opening ceremony.

“Today’s ribbon-cutting marks an important step forward in Virginia’s position on the cutting edge of the development of nuclear energy,” said Governor McDonnell. “This Fuel Technology Center will create direct and indirect jobs and opportunities for Virginians, and holds great potential for future growth in the Lynchburg area. I congratulate The Babcock & Wilcox Company and the many Virginians who have worked together to open this facility and I thank B&W for its continued commitment to the Commonwealth.”

The center marks the third major development in Virginia related to B&W’s small modular reactor (SMR) program since 2010, including a dedicated design facility and Integrated Systems Test (IST) facility. These developments, supported in part by grant funding for the IST facility from the Virginia Tobacco Indemnification and Revitalization Commission, have already created about 150 technology jobs in the state. In addition, 29 Virginia supplier companies are poised to supply the B&W mPower reactor program as it moves from design to manufacturing.

Advances in reactor technology, along with the widespread demand for clean, affordable, and domestic energy resources, have motivated the development of a new generation of commercial nuclear power around the world. Much of that research and development is happening here in Virginia, a state committed to energy technology development.

Governor McDonnell remarked, “This unique facility in Lynchburg is working to develop our domestic energy resources. To local Virginians, it promises a new era of high-tech jobs. And to America, it means a significant step forward in the development of affordable, reliable energy sources.”

Recently, the B&W team in Virginia and several other states applied for a new federal partnership program with the U.S. Department of Energy to support the development of SMRs. Governor McDonnell added, “The work being done by this team in Lynchburg is important to the nation. I hope that the Department of Energy will support their efforts to further expand development of the next generation of advanced nuclear power.”

Reflecting the importance of this new facility and its research, Governor McDonnell asked his senior economic advisor Bob Sledd to help cut the ribbon on the new facility. His delegation joins U.S. Congressman Bob Goodlatte, several local officials and Chris Mowry, the President of Babcock & Wilcox mPower, Inc. to celebrate this milestone.

Office of the Governor
Contact: Jeff Caldwell
Phone: (804) 225-4260
Email: Jeff.Caldwell@Governor.Virginia.Gov

The Babcock & Wilcox Company
Contact: Jud Simmons
Phone: (434) 522-6462
Email: hjsimmons@babcock.com

--------------------

3:55 PM Eastern 7/30/2012
ATOMIC POWER REVIEW
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Babcock & Wilcox ribbon cutting at mPower Fuel Technology Center

Posted on 12:44 by Unknown
Below is a press release direct to APR from Babcock & Wilcox.

--------------------

Ribbon Cutting Event Held at B&W mPower™ Fuel Technology Center

(LYNCHBURG, Va. – July 30, 2012) –The Babcock & Wilcox Company (B&W) (NYSE:BWC) was joined by Representative Bob Goodlatte (VA-6) and Bob Sledd, Senior Economic Advisor to the Governor of Virginia, for a ribbon-cutting ceremony today at the new B&W mPower™ Fuel Technology Center (FTC) in Lynchburg, Va. The advanced manufacturing technologies B&W will use to produce nuclear fuel for its B&W mPower small modular reactor (SMR) will be developed and qualified at the FTC. Longer term, the technologies developed at the FTC give B&W the ability to support the manufacture of fuel for other reactors.

This newly dedicated facility marks the third major infrastructure development project in Virginia related to the B&W mPower reactor, including the establishment of a dedicated design office in 2010 and an Integrated System Test facility in 2011.

The FTC has three primary missions:

· Develop and demonstrate key fabrication technologies and processes needed for the planned manufacture of B&W mPower reactor fuel and fuel-related components

· Fabricate production-representative prototype fuel assemblies and individual components in order to support the fuel design, testing and licensing process

· Serve as the materials test facility for engineers to evaluate the mechanical performance of both complete fuel assemblies and individual assembly components

Christofer M. Mowry, President of Babcock & Wilcox mPower, Inc., said, “Bringing a viable, proven SMR design to market requires an investment in facilities needed to qualify and manufacture reactor components. B&W is proud to add this dedicated facility to our robust B&W mPower development infrastructure. Our operational testing and manufacturing facilities, design maturity and unparalleled depth of industry partnerships are important reasons why the B&W mPower reactor is receiving strong interest from customers both domestically and abroad.”

Representative Goodlatte said, “B&W has a long history of nuclear manufacturing innovation, and today’s ceremony demonstrates how the company continues to stay on the cutting edge of energy technology development and deployment. The fact that this new facility will add more than a dozen high-tech jobs to the hundreds already created by B&W to develop their SMR program clearly demonstrates how a U.S. company can keep good-paying jobs at home and further develop our nation’s advanced manufacturing infrastructure.”

To date, B&W has invested more than $5 million in the FTC. The facility includes state-of-the-art robotics, inspection and welding equipment. No nuclear material is used at the facility.

About B&W

Headquartered in Charlotte, N.C., The Babcock & Wilcox Company is a leader in clean energy technology and services, primarily for the nuclear, fossil and renewable power markets, as well as a premier advanced technology and mission critical defense contractor. B&W has locations worldwide and employs approximately 12,700 people, in addition to approximately 10,400 joint venture employees. Learn more at www.babcock.com.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements

B&W cautions that statements in this release that are not historical fact may constitute forward-looking statements, including statements relating to the use of the B&W mPower™ Fuel Technology Center. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including, among other things, delays in or adverse changes relating to the funding B&W mPower research and development efforts and adverse changes in the supply of or demand for nuclear power. If one or more of these or other risks materialize, actual results may vary materially from those expected. For a more complete discussion of these and other risk factors, please see B&W's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. B&W cautions not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof, and undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, except to the extent required by applicable law.

Media Contact: Jud Simmons, Public Relations Manager, B&W
434.522.6462 » hjsimmons@babcock.com
--------------------

3:45 PM Eastern 7/30/2012
ATOMIC POWER REVIEW
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Carnival 115: The Carnival of Nuclear Bloggers

Posted on 06:52 by Unknown
Atomic Power Review is proud to again host the rotating Carnival of Nuclear Bloggers - a feature that week in, week out showcases the very best of the pro-nuclear blogging world. I've said many times that following this feature around the blogs is the best way to find out what is really on the top of the nuclear energy world's mind and that holds true this week as well.

We all know by now that access to the Carnival entries whenever this event takes place on APR is blocked by some sort of obscure image from the APR vault, which you're asked to identify later on. So let's get to it! Hint: The plant to which this piece of equipment relates was in the news this month, although not incredibly widely. So... What is this?


And now, Carnival 115.

--------------------

Meredith Angwin

Meredith submits two entries this week - one at Yes Vermont Yankee and one at the ANS Nuclear Cafe blog.

Gundersen / San Onofre - Yes Vermont Yankee

San Onofre Generating Station (SONGS) installed new steam generators, and the generators have serious problems. Arnie Gundersen has been hired by Friends of the Earth to write reports (pessimistic of course) on the extent of those problems. On radio in California,Gundersen asserted that he isn't an anti-nuclear activist because he signed a report approving of continued operation of Vermont Yankee. Gundersen as a Vermont Yankee supporter came as a surprise to Meredith Angwin of Yes Vermont Yankee.

Vermont State Nuclear Advisory Panel - ANS Nuclear Cafe

At ANS Nuclear Cafe, Meredith Angwin describes a recent meeting of the Vermont State Nuclear Advisory Panel. The panel's main topic was nuclear safety, despite the fact that a recent lawsuit re-affirmed that the state has no jurisdiction over nuclear safety. It was deja vu all over again.

--------------------

Leslie Corrice - The Hiroshima Syndrome

NAIIC report’s biggest mistake...

The Diet’s NAIIC report’s executive summary seems largely spot-on, drawing only a few questionable conclusions (e.g. keeping the earthquake-as-cause notion open). However, one serious mistake cries out to be exposed. Concerning the IC condenser stoppage on unit #1, the report calls Tepco's actions "irrational". The F. Daiichi unit #1staff’s actions and Tepco’s explanations were entirely correct. On the other hand, questioning the actions of the staff and calling Tepco’s explanations irrational is an exercise in ignorance.

--------------------

Gail Marcus - Nuke Power Talk

Decommissioning Fukushima

Gail Marcus, writing at Nuke Power Talk, praises a publication by Japan Atomic Industrial Forum (JAIF) President Takuya Hattori urging the Japanese government to conduct the decommissioning of the damaged Fukushima units openly, transparently, and with international involvement. His comments come amidst concern that the Japanese government may be exhibiting reluctance to work together with the international community on this critical effort. Among other points Hattori-san makes are that the effort will benefit from the united wisdom of the world, and the world will benefit from the shared knowledge to be gained. His specific proposals call for a platform for international R&D and an international decommissioning research center to be established.

--------------------

Dan Yurman - Idaho Samizdat

Race for SMR money heats up

The race for DOE's $452 million in SMR money heats up in Ohio. B&W inks MOU with First Energy for economic, siting, and licensing studies.

--------------------

Brian Wang - Next Big Future

Brian this week has submitted a number of interesting articles on reactor restarts or first startups.

Japan restarted a second nuclear reactor

Canada Point Lepreau has been licensed to restart

South Korea's Shin Kori 2 has begun commercial operation, Canada Bruce A Unit 1 has been permitted to restart, US nuclear uprate status and Russia And Belurus sign a $10 billion deal for new nuclear reactors.

It appears that China is in the lead to build the new nuclear reactors in the UK.

--------------------

Eric McErlain sends along a number of submissions from NEI Nuclear Notes this week covering a range of topics.

Westinghouse SVP Dan Lipman talks to the Global America Business Institute about the growing relationship between the two nations in civilian nuclear energy.

Political leaders in Missouri excited over prospect of DOE grant on small modular reactors.

Brad Plumer of the Washington Post tried to find something sinister in nuclear plant uprates, but NEI's Mark Flanagan snuffs him out.

In April 2011, the Worldwatch Institute predicted a rocky future for nuclear energy, but the most recent report from the OECD shows the predicited slowdown never occurred.

--------------------

Margaret Harding - 4Factor Consulting

Nuclear Quality Regulations

After a conversation with a colleague who is also a qualified lead NQA auditor, Margaret Harding muses about the idea of updating the quality regulations to a more modern approach that acknowledge other industry standards as opposed to the “go it alone” approach that the NRC takes today.

--------------------

Paul Bowersox has submitted a Suzanne Hobbs Baker article at ANS Nuclear Cafe:

"Climate Change and Nuclear Energy: We Need to Talk"

Nuclear power advocate Suzy Hobbs Baker speaks out on behalf of the threatened biosystems in the earth's acidifying oceans, and the people who are bearing the brunt of intensifying global climate change -- and in favor of the nuclear community emphasizing the essential role of nuclear technologies in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

--------------------

Rod Adams has entries from Atomic Insights and The Atomic Show:

Atomic Insights - Science Controversies and Print Edition Limitations – Jacobson versus radiation biology specialists

Last week, Professor Mark Z. Jacobson, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University, stepped way outside of his area of expertise by publishing a paper titled Worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident that claimed to quantify the number of cancers that may be caused by the radioactive material released by the Fukushima nuclear reactor plant core damage events. He is a respected atmospheric modeler who has specialized in creating multi variable modeles for the dispersal of particulate matter, but he has little or no background in radiation biology or in studying the health effects of radiation.

The Atomic Show #185 – Is Thorium Superior to Uranium?

On July 23, 2012, Rod Adams talked with Richard Martin, the author of SuperFuel: Thorium, the Green Energy Source for the Future and Kirk Sorensen, the co-founder and chief technology officer of Flibe Energy, a start-up company formed to “develop small modular reactors based on liquid-fluoride thorium reactor (LFTR) technology.” Kirk is also the founder of Energy from Thorium.

--------------------

That's it for this week's entries. I would like to note again the wide range of topical material covered this week - from rad health issues, to alternative reactor technologies, to startups of both brand new and shut down plants and more. There's even a provocative piece on global warming and how that relates to nuclear energy advocacy. It's probably not possible to get such a wide range of realistic views on energy generation and related issues every week anywhere else.

And NO, we didn't forget -- the photo! This photo is a February 1965 AP Wirephoto depicting the delivery of the reactor pressure vessel to Dairyland Power Co-Op's Genoa No. 2 plant, perhaps better known in nuclear energy circles as the LaCrosse Boiling Water Reactor. This was the last Allis-Chalmers nuclear plant to remain in operation (there were only three - Elk River, which really was started by ACF Nuclear; Pathfinder, one of only two nuclear superheat BWR's; and LaCrosse.) Here is the caption from the photo:

"Genoa, Wis., Feb 17- REACTOR ARRIVES - This 100 ton nuclear reactor pressure vessel for the La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor power plant dwarfs Owen Hockensmith, left, Maxon Construction of Dayton, Ohio, and E. L. Corrances, construction manager, Atomic Energy Division, Allis-Chalmers. The reactor was built by A-C under contract with the Atomic Energy Commission for the Dairyland Power Co-Op."

This plant was recently in the news because the owners have finally begun moving spent fuel from the spent fuel pool inside the reactor building to new storage on site but outside the plant; a move anticipated for many years. Here are some links:

LaCrosse Tribune, with great photos and details.

Post Crescent - AP Wire Story

Wisconsin State Journal - brief article with good photo.

The plant was officially rated at 155 MWt, 60 MWe gross and 50 MWe net. It was ordered under the AEC's demonstration program in the second round as an "Improved Cycle BWR." The plant had forced circulation, operated on the direct cycle with a single-pass single-zone (all identical fuel load) core.

The plant contracts between the AEC, Dairyland Power and Allis-Chalmers were signed in 1962, with a planned initial criticality of late 1965 but which had been postponed until August 1966 within a short time, and subsequent scheduled full power operation in November 1966. However, the plant did not achieve initial criticality until July 11, 1967 and first generated power on April 26, 1968.

Many problems were encountered during the years 1968 and 1969, and for the first third of 1970 so that the plant did not begin to generate significant amounts of electricity for the grid until around May of 1970. In contrast, above linked articles indicate that plant operators thought the design good and in later years the plant was quite reliable.

In case you're wondering, the reactor vessel shown in the photo earlier had an inside diameter of 8 feet 3 inches and was 37 feet tall. The vessel itself was 4 inches thick with an internal cladding of stainless steel .188 inches thick.

Finally we'll show a couple photos of the plant that long time readers of APR have seen before, but which I'll include for completeness. The first is a photo of the LaCrosse BWR plant (Dairyland Power Co-Op No. 2) under construction in May, 1964.


The last shot is a post card view of the completed plant as it appeared for many years; next to it is the larger Genoa No. 3 fossil fired plant.


That's it for Carnival 115! We all hope you've enjoyed the ride.

--------------------

LACBWR data from Battelle BNWL-326 and AEC WASH-1203-73.

--------------------

9:51 AM Eastern 7/30/2012
ATOMIC POWER REVIEW
Read More
Posted in carnival | No comments

Wednesday, 25 July 2012

B&W, FirstEnergy sign MOU for study of SMR construction

Posted on 07:18 by Unknown
Below is a press release direct to APR from Babcock & Wilcox, courtesy Jud Simmons of Babcock & Wilcox.

--------------------

B&W and FirstEnergy Announce MOU Regarding Economic, Site Selection and Licensing Studies for B&W mPowerTM Small Modular Reactor

Sens. Sherrod Brown and Rob Portman Voice Support for Plans

(CHARLOTTE, N.C. – July 25, 2012) –The Babcock & Wilcox Company (B&W) (NYSE: BWC) and FirstEnergy Corp. (NYSE: FE) announced today that FirstEnergy and a B&W subsidiary, Generation mPower LLC (GmP), have signed a Memorandum of Understanding regarding studies on the potential deployment of the B&W mPowerTM small modular reactor in FirstEnergy’s service territory.

FirstEnergy and GmP plan to work together to perform an independent financial review of mPower economics, evaluate several alternative potential sites for construction of B&W mPower plants, complete a preliminary pre-licensing analysis, and assess the need and timing for prospective deployment of B&W mPower plants in the FirstEnergy generation fleet.

The B&W mPower SMR is an advanced 180 MWe utility-scale nuclear reactor that incorporates robust, inherently safe protection systems and a fully underground containment structure. The mPower design maximizes the use of proven, mature systems and components within an innovative plant architecture that reduces construction risks and minimizes ownership costs.

“Our agreement today is an outgrowth of the company's involvement with B&W's consortium to promote the development of small modular reactors," said James H. Lash, president of FirstEnergy Generation and Chief Nuclear Officer. “Completing these studies will help us determine how B&W small modular reactors may be part of our long term generation planning.”

Christofer M. Mowry, President and Chief Executive Officer of GmP said, “This cooperative effort with FirstEnergy demonstrates growing interest in our B&W mPower SMR as a clean, efficient and affordable power generation option. B&W has a long history of working in Ohio, and our employees in the state have an important role in the development of safer, more secure nuclear technology. We appreciate FirstEnergy’s industry leadership, and look forward to working closely with them to complete these studies.”

“This agreement between FirstEnergy and Generation mPower represents another significant step towards making Ohio a hub for advanced manufacturing and next-generation energy,” Sen. Sherrod Brown (OH) said. “This agreement, which will draw on highly skilled Ohio workers from design and manufacturing to deployment, is critical to sustained job creation and international competitiveness in clean energy. I applaud FirstEnergy and Babcock & Wilcox, two companies with a significant presence in Ohio, for moving forward on American-made advanced power generation options for Ohio, the rest of the nation, and the world.”

“Sustained economic growth and job creation in the United States will require a domestic supply of safe, reliable, and cost-effective energy,” said Sen. Rob Portman (OH). “One or more small modular reactors in our state could not only provide this energy need, but would continue to support advanced energy careers in Ohio. I applaud FirstEnergy and Generation mPower for their commitment to advanced energy development and our nation's energy security."

About B&W

Headquartered in Charlotte, N.C., The Babcock & Wilcox Company is a leader in clean energy technology and services, primarily for the nuclear, fossil and renewable power markets, as well as a premier advanced technology and mission critical defense contractor. B&W has locations worldwide and employs approximately 12,700 people, in addition to approximately 10,400 joint venture employees. Learn more at www.babcock.com.

About FirstEnergy

FirstEnergy is a diversified energy company dedicated to safety, reliability and operational excellence. Its 10 electric distribution companies comprise one of the nation's largest investor-owned electric systems. Its diverse generating fleet features non-emitting nuclear, scrubbed baseload coal, natural gas, and pumped-storage hydro and other renewables, and has a total generating capacity of nearly 23,000 megawatts.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements

B&W cautions that this release contains forward-looking statements related to the Memorandum of Understanding and GmP’s plans with FirstEnergy thereunder. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including, among other things, that transactions currently contemplated by GmP and FirstEnergy may change materially during further good faith efforts to negotiate a mutually acceptable definitive agreement or that a definitive binding agreement may not be entered into if GmP and FirstEnergy fail to reach agreement on any material term. If one or more of these or other risks materialize, actual results may vary materially from those expressed. For a more complete discussion of these and other risk factors, please see B&W's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. B&W cautions not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof, and undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, except to the extent required by applicable law.

# # #

FirstEnergy Media Contact: Todd Schneider, Director, External Communications
330-384-5500 / tmschneider@firstenergycorp.com

FirstEnergy Investor Contact: Irene M. Prezelj, V.P. Investor Relations
330-384-3859 / imprezeli@firstenergycorp.com

B&W Media Contact: Jud Simmons, Public Relations Manager
434-522-6462 » hjsimmons@babcock.com

B&W Investor Contact: Michael P. Dickerson, V.P. and Investor Relations Officer
704-625-4944 » investors@babcock.com

--------------------

10:15 AN Eastern 7/25/2012
ATOMIC POWER REVIEW
Read More
Posted in Babcock, FirstEnergy, mPower, SMR | No comments

Tuesday, 24 July 2012

Westinghouse AP1000 project in Canada

Posted on 07:14 by Unknown
Below is a press release from Westinghouse. Some comment from APR follows.

--------------------

News Release Issued: July 23, 2012 10:30 AM EDT

Westinghouse To Prepare Detailed Construction Plans And Cost Estimates For Potential AP1000® Units At Darlington

Opens Westinghouse Electric Canada Office to Meet Growing Business Opportunities and Strengthen Ties with Customers and Suppliers

PITTSBURGH, July 23, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Westinghouse Electric Company today announced that it would prepare for Ontario Power Generation Inc. (OPG) detailed construction plans, schedules and cost estimates for two potential AP1000 nuclear reactors at OPG's Darlington site. The plans and estimates would provide significant input in helping the Province of Ontario determine the baseload generation option that is best for Ontario's ratepayers.

"Westinghouse is pleased to participate in the Province's information-gathering process," said Joe Zwetolitz, president, Westinghouse Americas. "Should the Province select our AP1000 as the preferred option, we believe that Ontario's infrastructure could become even more energy self-sufficient, creating local Canadian jobs during construction and opportunities for involving Canadian suppliers on this and future nuclear projects elsewhere in the world."

As further evidence of a commitment to the Canadian new build market, and to better serve existing customers, strengthen ties with suppliers, and align Westinghouse more appropriately with the regulations and requirements of Canada to meet growing business opportunities, Westinghouse is also pleased to announce the opening of the Westinghouse Electric Canada, Inc. office in Toronto.

"The formation of a Canadian entity earlier this year was consistent with our strategy to increase business in the country," said Zwetolitz. "With the opening of the Westinghouse Canada office in Toronto, we now have become more a part of Canada's viable nuclear energy industry."

Approximately 100 Canadian suppliers currently provide a wide range of products and services for the Westinghouse product lines of Fuel, Services, Automation, and Nuclear Power Plants. Additionally, a large percentage of the scope for the potential construction of AP1000 reactor units at Darlington would be sourced from Ontario or elsewhere in Canada, resulting in the opportunity to work with and qualify additional Canadian businesses and manufacturers to participate in the potential new build at Darlington and in other global nuclear projects.

Four AP1000 units are currently under construction at two sites in China and four units are under construction at two sites in the U.S. At each of these four sites, upwards of 3,500 construction workers are employed during the peak of construction activities. Once construction is complete, operation of a two-unit AP1000 nuclear plant requires up to 700 employees.

Westinghouse Electric Company, a group company of Toshiba Corporation (TKY:6502), is the world's pioneering nuclear energy company and is a leading supplier of nuclear plant products and technologies to utilities throughout the world. Westinghouse supplied the world's first pressurized water reactor in 1957 in Shippingport, Pa., USA. Today, Westinghouse technology is the basis for approximately one-half of the world's operating nuclear plants, including 60 percent of those in the United States.

www.westinghousenuclear.com
SOURCE Westinghouse Electric Company

--------------------

This is a very interesting prospect. As the press release notes, there are eight AP1000 plants under construction worldwide right now; there may or may not be two more under construction here in the United States in the predictable future, making ten. Adding two Canadian plants would make twelve. Someone, somewhere, must be thinking about the Westinghouse SNUPPS design and the cost benefits that it was supposed to confer because of the large number of units to be constructed at one time. (Only two were ever finished.) Although it's highly speculative, it would be fascinating to see what projected costs for various components do as the number of plants ordered continues to increase.

10:14 AM Eastern 7/24/2012
ATOMIC POWER REVIEW
Read More
Posted in | No comments

NEI Videos on Nuclear Construction Costs

Posted on 06:59 by Unknown
NEI has posted three new brief videos on its YouTube channel (these are also "favorited" on the APR YouTube channel) which answer some of the recent charges and questions about the cost of the new nuclear plants being built in the United States.

All three videos feature Steve Byrne of South Carolina Electric & Gas.

Briefly;

The first video addresses the charges that the new nuclear plants are over budget as a result of recent statements by the companies involved in their construction and newly released cost estimates.

The second video addresses the reduction in total cost made possible by CWIP provisions applied to the four plants presently under construction.

The third video briefly explains why we can expect present and future nuclear plant construction projects to come in under budget when compared with older nuclear builds which did not.

I applaud NEI for posting these; they give brief, concise reasons why no one should panic about the construction costs of the present working projects and how they might doom future nuclear builds - at least, on the large commercial scale - for the future.

10:00 AM Eastern 7/24/2012
ATOMIC POWER REVIEW
Read More
Posted in | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Steam Generators: Design and details
    A recent NRC blog post ( see here ) brings up a matter that has come into focus of late at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station in Californ...
  • The 136th Carnival of Nuclear Bloggers
    I find myself on this December 23rd, making the Atomic Power Review entry hosting the 136th Carnival, thinking about all of the great achiev...
  • Nuclear Icebreakers 101
    An addendum for National Nuclear Science Week - Day 3 In the previous post I gave the briefest overview of the history of the Russian fleet ...
  • Xenon / Fukushima Daiichi No. 2 - Thursday afternoon update
    The information at present from TEPCO echoes that printed here this morning. Here is the latest TEPCO analysis: -We found a possibility to d...
  • The effect of big media: A real conversation
    I recently had a conversation with a friend of mine that interestingly turned nuclear. She's married, mother of one beautiful nine month...
  • INFOCAST Press Release: Waste Confidence Conference in October
    Press Release below from Infocast.  See link button on right sidebar to access the Infocast site page covering this timely and relevant conf...
  • The 84th Carnival of Nuclear Bloggers
    Once again Atomic Power Review is proud to host the rotating Carnival of Nuclear Bloggers - this, the 84th edition. This feature travels aro...
  • Carnival of Nuclear Bloggers comes to APR
    60th Carnival of Nuclear Bloggers Atomic Power Review is very proud to host, for the first time, the rotating Carnival. This feature present...
  • 60th anniversary of EBR-I power generation
    Yesterday and today mark an important event in nuclear energy history; these two days are the span during which the EBR-1 reactor plant, whi...
  • SCE Demands Mitsubishi Allow Contractually Mandated Audit
    The following press release was received last evening from Southern California Edison. ---------- Media Contact: Media Relations, (626) 302-...

Categories

  • " fukushima daiichi"
  • "accident"
  • "alloy"
  • "ameren"
  • "american nuclear society"
  • "annealing"
  • "anniversary"
  • "ans"
  • "anti-nuclear"
  • "AP1000"
  • "arco"
  • "areva"
  • "asn"
  • "associated press" "NRC" "NEI"
  • "atomic journal"
  • "babcock"
  • "blackout"
  • "bloggers"
  • "boron"
  • "brazil"
  • "breeder reactor"
  • "breeder"
  • "browns ferry"
  • "browns ferry" "nine mile point"
  • "BWR"
  • "calhoun"
  • "callaway"
  • "carnival"
  • "chernobyl"
  • "china"
  • "chubu electric" "hamaoka"
  • "chubu" "hamaoka"
  • "chubu" "hamaoka" "tepco" "fukushima daiichi"
  • "chubu" "kyushu" "nisa"
  • "COL"
  • "commissioners"
  • "containment"
  • "contaminated"
  • "cooling"
  • "cooper" "ft calhoun" "flood" "missouri river"
  • "core damage"
  • "criticality"
  • "davis-besse"
  • "delta IV"
  • "dresden" "boiling water reactor" "containment"
  • "dry dock"
  • "dry well"
  • "earth day"
  • "earthquake"
  • "EBR"
  • "ebwr"
  • "education"
  • "elk river"
  • "embrittlement"
  • "enclosure"
  • "energy policy"
  • "equipment"
  • "fabrication"
  • "fermi"
  • "fire"
  • "flood"
  • "frontline"
  • "ft calhoun"
  • "ft calhoun" "oppd" "flood"
  • "ft st vrain"
  • "fukushima daiichi"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "BWR"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "nisa" "tepco"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "dry well" "containment" "pressure vessel"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "iaea"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "kurion" "areva"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa" "genkai" "pressure vessel"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa" "jaif"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa" "japan"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa" "jsc" "road map" "recovery"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa" "spent fuel" "pool"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nitrogen"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "robot" "video"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "tokai" "japco" "iaea"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "tomari" "hokkaido"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "tsunami"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "video"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "video" "youtube"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "TMI" "public opinion" "survey"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "video"
  • "fukushima daiichi" 7 8 plants economic plan TEPCO
  • "fukushima daiichi" cooling water release sea ocean nuclear reactor accident NISA TEPCO pit trench tunnel
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident contaminated water barge Suzuran Rosatom TEPCO
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident contaminated water sea radwaste condensers nitrogen hydrogen inert
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident earthquake onagawa TEPCO tohoku BWR nitrogen
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident IAEA TEPCO update briefing temperatures pressures
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident japan update color dye containment fabric update
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident leakage sea seawater contamination tunnel trench cable pit
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident liquid glass sodium silicate TEPCO
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident nitrogen hydrogen inert dry well drywell
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident nitrogen inert radiolytic radiolysis hydrogen
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident polymer leak concrete contaminated contamination reactor pressure vessel containment cooling
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident seawater contamination iodine tunnel trench TEPCO NISA JAIF
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident site update status project future
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident sodium silicate liquid glass diagram drawing perspective pipe tunnel trench contamination sea seawater
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident TEPCO NISA JAIF update
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident update TEPCO JAIF NISA
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident water leakage contamination workers found dead
  • "fukushima"
  • "gas cooled"
  • "genkai"
  • "genkai" "embrittlement" "brittle" "pressure vessel"
  • "genkai" "kyushu"
  • "hack job"
  • "hallam"
  • "head"
  • "hearing"
  • "hearings"
  • "higashidori"
  • "hitachi"
  • "HNPF"
  • "hurricane"
  • "hydrogen"
  • "IAEA"
  • "icebreaker"
  • "IFR"
  • "INES"
  • "injection"
  • "irene"
  • "irrelevant"
  • "jaczko"
  • "jaczko" "NRC"
  • "JAIF"
  • "japan"
  • "kurion"
  • "kyushu"
  • "laguna verde"
  • "lenin"
  • "licensing"
  • "loop"
  • "lunch"
  • "marcoule"
  • "mark I"
  • "melt"
  • "meltdown"
  • "mexico"
  • "mitsubishi"
  • "MK I" "containment" "suppression" "youtube" "video"
  • "mPower"
  • "mPower" "Bechtel" "TVA" "babcock"
  • "national nuclear science week"
  • "nei"
  • "new nuclear"
  • "NISA"
  • "nitrogen"
  • "no 5"
  • "no 6"
  • "north anna"
  • "NRC"
  • "NRTS"
  • "nuclear aftershocks"
  • "nuclear energy institute"
  • "nuclear history"
  • "nuclear icebreaker"
  • "office for nuclear regulation"
  • "op-ed"
  • "op-ed" "carnival"
  • "op-ed" "fukushima daiichi"
  • "opinion"
  • "oversight"
  • "palisades"
  • "pbs"
  • "peer review"
  • "poll"
  • "PRA"
  • "press"
  • "pressure vessel"
  • "pressurized thermal shock"
  • "primary to secondary leak"
  • "PTS"
  • "public attitudes"
  • "PWR"
  • "RBMK-1000"
  • "RBMK-1500"
  • "RBMK-2400"
  • "RBMK"
  • "reactor safety"
  • "reading list"
  • "recriticality"
  • "Reid"
  • "reporting"
  • "restart"
  • "risk"
  • "robot"
  • "rod adams" "glenn williams" "interview" "atomic show" "the street"
  • "safety"
  • "san onofre"
  • "sarry"
  • "SBO"
  • "sheldon station"
  • "shippingport"
  • "SMR"
  • "solar"
  • "songs"
  • "south africa"
  • "south texas project"
  • "spent fuel"
  • "SSBN"
  • "steam generator"
  • "steam generators"
  • "steel"
  • "stress tests"
  • "submarine"
  • "support"
  • "Svinicki"
  • "sylcor"
  • "sylvania-corning"
  • "TEPCO"
  • "tepco" "tohoku" "kyushu" "japan"
  • "TMI"
  • "tokyo electric"
  • "Toshiba"
  • "twitter"
  • "UK"
  • "update"
  • "vermont yankee"
  • "vessel"
  • "video"
  • "virgil c summer"
  • "virginia"
  • "vogtle"
  • "wash-1250"
  • "WASH"
  • "westinghouse"
  • "westinghouse" "AP1000" "NRC"
  • "xenon"
  • "youtube"
  • ANO
  • ANS
  • arkansas nuclear one
  • Babcock
  • brittle fracture
  • brookhaven
  • carnival
  • crystal river
  • decommissioning
  • earthquake
  • enriched uranium
  • Entergy
  • fintan dunne
  • FirstEnergy
  • fresno
  • fuel elements
  • fukushima daiichi
  • higashidori
  • hurricane
  • hurricanes
  • industrial accident
  • INES
  • kashiwazaki kariwa TEPCO earthquake
  • kenya
  • license amendment
  • MHI
  • mitsubishi
  • mPower
  • NEI
  • northern fleet
  • nrc
  • nuclear electricity project
  • nuclear history
  • nuclear submarines
  • onagawa tohoku leak earthquake
  • OSHA
  • oyster creek
  • palisades
  • press release
  • pressurized thermal shock
  • PTS
  • retire
  • russian navy
  • san onofre
  • sandy
  • sce
  • sherrell r greene
  • shutdown
  • SMR
  • socal ed
  • songs
  • southern california edison
  • spent fuel
  • spent fuel pool
  • spent fuel pools
  • status
  • steam generator
  • steam generators
  • surry
  • sustainable energy today
  • sylcor
  • sylvania-corning
  • TEPCO
  • tohoku electric power higashidori onagawa LOOP fuel pool cooling
  • tokyo electric power company
  • unusual event

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (71)
    • ▼  October (5)
      • South Korea: Cables fail tests; Government suing ...
      • SCE Requests Arbitration in SONGS Steam Generator ...
      • SCE Demands Mitsubishi Allow Contractually Mandate...
      • Resin-based solution to Fukushima water problems
      • SCE Demands Reimbursement from Mitsubishi for San ...
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (13)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2012 (159)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (15)
    • ►  June (16)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (18)
  • ►  2011 (270)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (20)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (17)
    • ►  July (23)
    • ►  June (24)
    • ►  May (44)
    • ►  April (78)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile