Below, some of the temporary tanks installed near Units 5 and 6 in a TEPCO release.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c052/7c0527c0aa8b803663f2d9974212569b4932354d" alt=""
And some further... and much larger (click to expand) TEPCO press photos showing the interlinked tank setups. Note that these are NOT the same as the tanks mentioned in the opening paragraph of this post. These are the previously designed tanks for temporary storage, and the tanks now ordered will vastly exceed these in total capacity later on when fully installed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/071ab/071abe9598509b1b85a44b354e6ca6a4ff65b04e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dca60/dca6089af2c232a06b9bc01ce762245ef028cba5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1eed1/1eed1a4ca21a4cc80f0e8c97aeee83762dec5826" alt=""
Water injection (all feed line injection) to No. 1 and No. 2 plants stands at about 5 cubic meters per hour, both, and both have feed nozzle temperatures right at about 110C. No. 3 plant's injection rate is 11.5 cubic meters per hour with a feed nozzle temperature of 150C.
TEPCO, no longer believing the previous reactor vessel pressure indication, has installed a temporary gauge at No. 1 plant which will be viewed remotely by a temporary television camera. TEPCO has noted for some time, apparently, that feed pump discharge pressure was widely disparate from the indicated instrument pressure and has made this move to correctly determine the value. TEPCO's press release (handout) indicates this work will also be performed identically at the other two reactors affected.
There is a small flap going on among various entities in Japan over cylinder liner failures in some EDG's. One at the fast breeder Monju plant has been found with failed liners, and investigation has shown that liners of certain original vintage (made Feb '87 through May '89) may have excessive lead content and thus be weak... although a note was made about jacking the liners without adequate monitoring leading to excessive forcing. As far as TEPCO is concerned, only Fukushima Daini No. 2 and No. 4 plants have similar diesels with similar liners, so that the problem appears not to be wide spread.
9:00 PM Eastern Friday June 3, 2011
ATOMIC POWER REVIEW
0 comments:
Post a Comment