Mitsubishi Tech Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 3 June 2011

Nuclear Sanity, Nuclear Insanity, Fukushima, and the NRC

Posted on 15:02 by Unknown
It has been nearly three months since the beginning of the Fukushima Daiichi Accident, which itself properly cannot be defined as being 'over' and in fact now is proving to be an affair as protracted as anyone familiar with such scenarios (all of which have until now been only theorized) might have imagined. While the struggle to perform many crucial tasks continues on site, another struggle rages on all around the world; that struggle is for the majority opinion regarding nuclear energy.

In some places, there has been a media fueled knee-jerk anti-nuclear response the like of which has not been seen before. Witness Germany, which has announced its plans to rid itself of nuclear energy by the year 2022. While there are numerous theories about many political motivations for this plan... which is actually a revived plan temporarily stalled by Angela Merkel, who now supports it ... the fact of the matter is that it is being hailed in some quarters as indicative of that attitude which all environmentally responsible persons should strive to adopt. Italy has announced as well (some time ago, actually) that it will no longer pursue nuclear energy. Switzerland also will follow.

On the other hand, in some places the nuclear energy aspirations continue exactly as before with no change. Witness Saudi Arabia's just-announced plan to have 16 plants on its grid by the year 2030. Economic reasoning, not environmental hyperbole, is the driving factor behind this program.

Somewhere in the center, in a much more nebulous position, is the United States. The USA has no central nuclear energy policy, and has had none for decades. After it became perceived generally that the Atomic Energy Commission was in an all too powerful a position vis a vis nuclear energy, given its mandate to regulate but also its mandate to promote, and seeing that the NEPA did not have entirely the desired effect, the Congress abolished the AEC in 1974, assigning its duties to an office which now is part of the Department of Energy (the promotional and research duties) and to the newly formed Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the licensing, oversight / regulatory, and punitive duties.) At that point, with environmentalism newly developing, the Congress essentially set up a department that was as powerful in an anti-nuclear sense (the NRC) as the AEC had ever been in a pro-nuclear sense.

Following this, the only body in the country that was part of the government and which could be considered as pro-nuclear was the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, or the JCAE. After the JCAE fought on by itself with some limits (it also lost some powers in 1974) it finally fought its last after heavily promoting the Clinch River Breeder Project (an attempt to improve the fuel cycle economics of nuclear energy) among other things, and was disbanded by Congress in 1977. Its duties were spread around to roughly 24 different subcommittees.

At this point -- 1977's disbanding of the JCAE -- pro-nuclear forces in this country no longer had any hope of centralized support from the federal government, and this was absolutely deliberate. Instead, the reverse has been seen; as pointed out recently by Rod Adams, the NRC has never in its existence received an initial application for a nuclear plant, processed it, granted licenses and then seen that plant given an operating license. To be clear, the approval rate for new plants start to finish then for the NRC is ZERO; all plants ordered after formation of the NRC were cancelled. No agency or committee could be thought of then as being more obstructionist than the NRC, whose job very clearly would, given its track record, seem to be to prevent the construction of any further nuclear plants in the United States.

Recently, over the last two years, there has been a growing surge toward new nuclear plants in the USA; many including this author call this the Nuclear Renaissance. Much of the attention was given to the Westinghouse AP1000 plant as a leader in the new generation of plants, but recently some very suspicious "whistle blower" letters to the NRC caused a very public negative statement about the AP1000 and Westinghouse in general to be released. To its credit, Westinghouse responded strongly (but calmly) and publicly to this almost unprecedented NRC action.

Further, the NRC has not only issued a number of statements (and its officials have been quoted in the press) along the line that Fukushima Daiichi means we must review all plants in the United States for safety but now has released a statement indicating that there have been indications to the NRC that it is "too lax" in regulating, and this is why the new tough stance.

Let me be clear: This is a "straw man." There are no such statements. No one can possibly think for one moment that the NRC -- with a zero order-to-on-the-grid approval rating -- is too lax. The NRC is in fact quite the opposite. Its chairman, Gregory Jaczko, is not in the position he is in because he is an experienced nuclear engineer or plant operator; he is neither. It would seem that he is there because he is anti-nuclear in point of fact.

Taking all of the above into account, I now get to the heart of the matter at hand; what then is the nuclear industry as a whole, and the mass of pro-nuclear advocates to do with the NRC? Surely the NRC cannot be imagined to be PRO-nuclear at any point since clearly its duties were set up from the first to be ANTI-nuclear. Surely with appointments of anti-nuclear persons to the NRC in high places it cannot be assumed that the NRC will support, much less befriend, anyone pro-nuclear.

The plain fact of the matter is that it is vitally important that the NRC only regulate plants, provide oversight, and not have any input from any political agendas. In order that this be possible, it is essential that all of the most senior persons in the NRC have serious experience in the nuclear energy field. There is no excuse why a governmental regulatory body such as the NRC should be staffed with politically chosen appointees instead of people accomplished in, and recognized in, the field. This must be pursued.

Since this is not likely ever to happen, it then becomes essential that the pro-nuclear groups (and that can mean everyone from the large trade groups to the individual bloggers and authors) call the NRC on every politically motivated action it takes, and on every obstructionist action it leverages. It is also vital that "straw man" arguments (indicating that there is some sentiment when there is not, some statement when there is not, some accusation when there is not) be rightly identified and exposed for what they really are.

It is also essential that the NRC's gross exaggerations about supposed lapses in judgement, incapabilities of analysis, and errors in calculation by reactor vendors, architect-engineers, utilities and contractors be spotlighted for what they are.

The agency that pro-nuclear advocates need to encourage to be more vocal, more involved, and better covered in the big media really is the Department of Energy's Office of Nuclear Energy. This is the lineal descendant of the section of the AEC that got divided off into what originally in 1974 was called the ERDA or Energy Research and Development Administration. What, you say? Never heard of it? Many have not, but it has a rather elaborate website here:

DOE Office of Nuclear Energy

Of course, 'big media' will never report on items seen in this agency's reports. They're sensible, and not panicked hyperbole. One of the reports of interest at this agency's site covers the ability to manufacture forgings of the size needed for Gen III nuclear plants.. and how we don't have that capability here in the United States. (We can still make forgings large enough for plants the size that we have now, if needed.) A number of interesting reports on development in, and the future of, nuclear energy are available at the site. Nowhere near what is at the NRC site in a negative sense, but significant in a positive sense even if small.

In the final analysis, we must see in this country that since the only presently operating and involved and vocal and publicly seen body is the anti-nuclear NRC, the chips overall in the nuclear future of our country may well fall more to the states and ongoing problems at some plants (Vermont Yankee) or the economic promises of others (Vogtle.) We know one thing; the environmentalists have no easy ground to walk, given reports such as this seen on Reuters:

40 million tonnes more CO2 per year when Germany goes non-nuclear

They cannot have their cake and eat it too. Other forms of energy cannot ever economically provide base load power like nuclear energy can, and all the figures point to that. The recent push back against the economics of nuclear energy and our growing need worldwide for electricity is purely driven by unrealistic fear of nuclear accident, specifically because of Fukushima Daiichi. The environmentalists must now either as a result backtrack on their decades of global warming diatribes if they are to allow wholesale shutdown of nuclear (recently one of their darlings, now a stepchild again) or else become better informed about the actual safety of nuclear energy if global warming is to be averted. It seems at the moment that the NRC is acting as their lap dog, which is unfortunate at best and diabolical at worst.

As pro-nuclear advocates go, we may find ourselves at a watershed moment when nuclear literacy is in demand, when the NRC is being exposed for what it really is, when the NRC and the EPA might actually be thought of as being at odds (given the CO2 emissions that will increase if nuclear is abandoned) and when little media such as the blog you are reading is getting 1200 page views a day from all around the world, or better. At the surface it seems a bad moment for pro-nuclear advocacy but in point of fact there may be no better hour to act boldly, with confidence that what the public really wants is the truth, and results.. something the EPA, global warming advocates, and the NRC cannot hope to produce.

7:10 PM Eastern Friday June 3, 2011
ATOMIC POWER REVIEW

Note: Fukushima Daiichi update to come later this evening.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in "op-ed" | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Nitrogen inerting drywells..
    Apparently the nitrogen injection to the drywell on No. 1 plant continues... and TEPCO has made a fairly revealing press release which inclu...
  • NuSource LLC - Press Release
    Press release on formation of NuSource LLC follows. MPR & Gavial Form Joint Venture, NuSource LLC, to Address Nuclear Industry Obsolesce...
  • Nuclear Icebreakers 101
    An addendum for National Nuclear Science Week - Day 3 In the previous post I gave the briefest overview of the history of the Russian fleet ...
  • Atomic History: Dresden-1
    In one of our previous discussions concerning the nature of reactor plant containment, we made considerable effort to detail the very early ...
  • San Onofre seismic study - Press release 4/27
    Press release below from SoCal Ed. Some very interesting news about a cooperative project to further investigate the seismic environment at...
  • Davis-Besse vessel head replacement
    As reported on the NRC blog, Davis-Besse has been shut down for replacement of its pressure vessel head. This plant is a Babcock & Wilco...
  • Carnival 81 on line now
    Dan Yurman has posted the 81st Carnival of Nuclear Bloggers over at his fine blog, "Idaho Samizdat." APR's post on the Decembe...
  • An interesting week, to say the least.
    This has indeed been an interesting week for those who follow the news in nuclear energy. Here is a brief recap from my perspective. NRC CH...
  • Brief Fukushima Daiichi update- Sunday 5/22
    As reported on this blog on April 23, TEPCO has (again) noted the discovery of radioactive debris on the Fukushima Daiichi site which is emi...
  • APR note: APR now on Twitter!
    After much consideration, I have decided to open a Twitter account for Atomic Power Review in order to post relevant news and site updates. ...

Categories

  • " fukushima daiichi"
  • "accident"
  • "alloy"
  • "ameren"
  • "american nuclear society"
  • "annealing"
  • "anniversary"
  • "ans"
  • "anti-nuclear"
  • "AP1000"
  • "arco"
  • "areva"
  • "asn"
  • "associated press" "NRC" "NEI"
  • "atomic journal"
  • "babcock"
  • "blackout"
  • "bloggers"
  • "boron"
  • "brazil"
  • "breeder reactor"
  • "breeder"
  • "browns ferry"
  • "browns ferry" "nine mile point"
  • "BWR"
  • "calhoun"
  • "callaway"
  • "carnival"
  • "chernobyl"
  • "china"
  • "chubu electric" "hamaoka"
  • "chubu" "hamaoka"
  • "chubu" "hamaoka" "tepco" "fukushima daiichi"
  • "chubu" "kyushu" "nisa"
  • "COL"
  • "commissioners"
  • "containment"
  • "contaminated"
  • "cooling"
  • "cooper" "ft calhoun" "flood" "missouri river"
  • "core damage"
  • "criticality"
  • "davis-besse"
  • "delta IV"
  • "dresden" "boiling water reactor" "containment"
  • "dry dock"
  • "dry well"
  • "earth day"
  • "earthquake"
  • "EBR"
  • "ebwr"
  • "education"
  • "elk river"
  • "embrittlement"
  • "enclosure"
  • "energy policy"
  • "equipment"
  • "fabrication"
  • "fermi"
  • "fire"
  • "flood"
  • "frontline"
  • "ft calhoun"
  • "ft calhoun" "oppd" "flood"
  • "ft st vrain"
  • "fukushima daiichi"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "BWR"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "nisa" "tepco"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "dry well" "containment" "pressure vessel"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "iaea"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "kurion" "areva"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa" "genkai" "pressure vessel"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa" "jaif"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa" "japan"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa" "jsc" "road map" "recovery"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nisa" "spent fuel" "pool"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "nitrogen"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "robot" "video"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "tokai" "japco" "iaea"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "tomari" "hokkaido"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "tsunami"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "video"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "tepco" "video" "youtube"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "TMI" "public opinion" "survey"
  • "fukushima daiichi" "video"
  • "fukushima daiichi" 7 8 plants economic plan TEPCO
  • "fukushima daiichi" cooling water release sea ocean nuclear reactor accident NISA TEPCO pit trench tunnel
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident contaminated water barge Suzuran Rosatom TEPCO
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident contaminated water sea radwaste condensers nitrogen hydrogen inert
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident earthquake onagawa TEPCO tohoku BWR nitrogen
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident IAEA TEPCO update briefing temperatures pressures
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident japan update color dye containment fabric update
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident leakage sea seawater contamination tunnel trench cable pit
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident liquid glass sodium silicate TEPCO
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident nitrogen hydrogen inert dry well drywell
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident nitrogen inert radiolytic radiolysis hydrogen
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident polymer leak concrete contaminated contamination reactor pressure vessel containment cooling
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident seawater contamination iodine tunnel trench TEPCO NISA JAIF
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident site update status project future
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident sodium silicate liquid glass diagram drawing perspective pipe tunnel trench contamination sea seawater
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident TEPCO NISA JAIF update
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident update TEPCO JAIF NISA
  • "fukushima daiichi" nuclear reactor accident water leakage contamination workers found dead
  • "fukushima"
  • "gas cooled"
  • "genkai"
  • "genkai" "embrittlement" "brittle" "pressure vessel"
  • "genkai" "kyushu"
  • "hack job"
  • "hallam"
  • "head"
  • "hearing"
  • "hearings"
  • "higashidori"
  • "hitachi"
  • "HNPF"
  • "hurricane"
  • "hydrogen"
  • "IAEA"
  • "icebreaker"
  • "IFR"
  • "INES"
  • "injection"
  • "irene"
  • "irrelevant"
  • "jaczko"
  • "jaczko" "NRC"
  • "JAIF"
  • "japan"
  • "kurion"
  • "kyushu"
  • "laguna verde"
  • "lenin"
  • "licensing"
  • "loop"
  • "lunch"
  • "marcoule"
  • "mark I"
  • "melt"
  • "meltdown"
  • "mexico"
  • "mitsubishi"
  • "MK I" "containment" "suppression" "youtube" "video"
  • "mPower"
  • "mPower" "Bechtel" "TVA" "babcock"
  • "national nuclear science week"
  • "nei"
  • "new nuclear"
  • "NISA"
  • "nitrogen"
  • "no 5"
  • "no 6"
  • "north anna"
  • "NRC"
  • "NRTS"
  • "nuclear aftershocks"
  • "nuclear energy institute"
  • "nuclear history"
  • "nuclear icebreaker"
  • "office for nuclear regulation"
  • "op-ed"
  • "op-ed" "carnival"
  • "op-ed" "fukushima daiichi"
  • "opinion"
  • "oversight"
  • "palisades"
  • "pbs"
  • "peer review"
  • "poll"
  • "PRA"
  • "press"
  • "pressure vessel"
  • "pressurized thermal shock"
  • "primary to secondary leak"
  • "PTS"
  • "public attitudes"
  • "PWR"
  • "RBMK-1000"
  • "RBMK-1500"
  • "RBMK-2400"
  • "RBMK"
  • "reactor safety"
  • "reading list"
  • "recriticality"
  • "Reid"
  • "reporting"
  • "restart"
  • "risk"
  • "robot"
  • "rod adams" "glenn williams" "interview" "atomic show" "the street"
  • "safety"
  • "san onofre"
  • "sarry"
  • "SBO"
  • "sheldon station"
  • "shippingport"
  • "SMR"
  • "solar"
  • "songs"
  • "south africa"
  • "south texas project"
  • "spent fuel"
  • "SSBN"
  • "steam generator"
  • "steam generators"
  • "steel"
  • "stress tests"
  • "submarine"
  • "support"
  • "Svinicki"
  • "sylcor"
  • "sylvania-corning"
  • "TEPCO"
  • "tepco" "tohoku" "kyushu" "japan"
  • "TMI"
  • "tokyo electric"
  • "Toshiba"
  • "twitter"
  • "UK"
  • "update"
  • "vermont yankee"
  • "vessel"
  • "video"
  • "virgil c summer"
  • "virginia"
  • "vogtle"
  • "wash-1250"
  • "WASH"
  • "westinghouse"
  • "westinghouse" "AP1000" "NRC"
  • "xenon"
  • "youtube"
  • ANO
  • ANS
  • arkansas nuclear one
  • Babcock
  • brittle fracture
  • brookhaven
  • carnival
  • crystal river
  • decommissioning
  • earthquake
  • enriched uranium
  • Entergy
  • fintan dunne
  • FirstEnergy
  • fresno
  • fuel elements
  • fukushima daiichi
  • higashidori
  • hurricane
  • hurricanes
  • industrial accident
  • INES
  • kashiwazaki kariwa TEPCO earthquake
  • kenya
  • license amendment
  • MHI
  • mitsubishi
  • mPower
  • NEI
  • northern fleet
  • nrc
  • nuclear electricity project
  • nuclear history
  • nuclear submarines
  • onagawa tohoku leak earthquake
  • OSHA
  • oyster creek
  • palisades
  • press release
  • pressurized thermal shock
  • PTS
  • retire
  • russian navy
  • san onofre
  • sandy
  • sce
  • sherrell r greene
  • shutdown
  • SMR
  • socal ed
  • songs
  • southern california edison
  • spent fuel
  • spent fuel pool
  • spent fuel pools
  • status
  • steam generator
  • steam generators
  • surry
  • sustainable energy today
  • sylcor
  • sylvania-corning
  • TEPCO
  • tohoku electric power higashidori onagawa LOOP fuel pool cooling
  • tokyo electric power company
  • unusual event

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (71)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (13)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2012 (159)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (15)
    • ►  June (16)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (18)
  • ▼  2011 (270)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (20)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (17)
    • ►  July (23)
    • ▼  June (24)
      • Nuclear in Japan: Brief update
      • Flooding: Ft. Calhoun and Cooper
      • Brief Fukushima Update: June 28, 2011
      • Generation mPower and TVA
      • Fukushima Daiichi Update: Friday, June 24, 2011
      • Two interviews.
      • Fukushima Daiichi update: Wednesday, June 22, 2011
      • Public Opinion in Japan
      • Associated Press "hack job" article draws responses
      • Atomic History: Dresden-1
      • JAIF Public Opinion Poll Data
      • OPPD Flood Blog ...
      • Fukushima Daiichi update: Saturday, June 18, 2011
      • How the Misinformation Superhighway affects Nuclea...
      • Fukushima Daiichi update: Tuesday June 14, 2011
      • Fukushima Daiichi update: Saturday, June 11, 2011
      • Fukushima Daiichi: Wednesday update June 8
      • Fukushima Daiichi update: Tuesday June 7
      • TEPCO Video: Dust inhibitor operations
      • TEPCO video: Steam and high rad levels in No. 1 p...
      • Fukushima Daiichi update: Friday June 3
      • Nuclear Sanity, Nuclear Insanity, Fukushima, and t...
      • IAEA Initial Report - June 1
      • Fukushima Daiichi update June 1st
    • ►  May (44)
    • ►  April (78)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile